Aligning E-Government with Stakeholders: From Stakeholder Categorisations to E-Government Public Service Provision

Successful e-government initiatives depend on the alignment of the objectives of public services with its stakeholders. While stakeholder engagement is widely acknowledged to be essential for developing e-government services, debates persist around the definition and categorisation of stakeholders within e-government contexts. This article critically examines how stakeholder categorisations can help e-government public services to be user-centric. However, the study also highlights the complexity of involving different stakeholders in e-government, particularly those with varying levels of interest or influence, the difficulties inherent in building and maintaining relationships with stakeholders, unequal power dynamics, inadequate legislation and political structure, lack of time and willingness throughout the public service cycle. The findings from a systematic literature review are synthesised into a framework and reveal the relevance of more targeted and context-sensitive approaches to stakeholder categorisations, linking them to different engagement methods and challenges to ensure the long-term success and sustainability of user-centric public services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Polity
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255261488285
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aligning E-Government with Stakeholders: From Stakeholder Categorisations to E-Government Public Service Provision

Noella Edelmann, Shefali Virkar, Lucy Temple, Valerie Albrecht
Information Polity
E-Government and Public Services
article

Aligning E-Government with Stakeholders: From Stakeholder Categorisations to E-Government Public Service Provision

Noella Edelmann, Shefali Virkar, Lucy Temple, Valerie Albrecht
article en

Abstract

Successful e-government initiatives depend on the alignment of the objectives of public services with its stakeholders. While stakeholder engagement is widely acknowledged to be essential for developing e-government services, debates persist around the definition and categorisation of stakeholders within e-government contexts. This article critically examines how stakeholder categorisations can help e-government public services to be user-centric. However, the study also highlights the complexity of involving different stakeholders in e-government, particularly those with varying levels of interest or influence, the difficulties inherent in building and maintaining relationships with stakeholders, unequal power dynamics, inadequate legislation and political structure, lack of time and willingness throughout the public service cycle. The findings from a systematic literature review are synthesised into a framework and reveal the relevance of more targeted and context-sensitive approaches to stakeholder categorisations, linking them to different engagement methods and challenges to ensure the long-term success and sustainability of user-centric public services.

Information Polity
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Aligning E-Government with Stakeholders: From Stakeholder Categorisations to E-Government Public Service Provision — Noella Edelmann, Shefali Virkar, et al. · Information Polity (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS