Occupational sex segregation is strongly predicted by psychological sex differences

Abstract If traits of individuals are associated with occupational choice, sex differences in those traits should be associated with sex differences in occupational choice, and consequently, with occupational sex segregation. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the extent to which this is the case for spatial ability, verbal ability, agreeableness, emotional stability, interest in people and interest in things, across 429 occupations. Participants ( N = 2,576, aged 35–45) completed online tests and questionnaires, while students rated occupational requirements. For each occupation, the population sex composition of people with traits in line with requirements was estimated, using trait sex differences and occupational requirement profiles. Estimates were highly predictive of actual population sex ratios, with the model assessing interest and cognition in conjunction explaining the most variance ( R 2 = .49), followed by the interest model ( R 2 = .46) and the cognition model ( R 2 = .18). Among individual traits, sex differences in interest in things were by far the most predictive ( R 2 = .42). Notably, sex differences in cognition were more predictive of high proportions of men in occupations than high proportions of women. Given lifespan trait stability, these results suggest that cognition and interests matter in occupational choice, with sex differences consequently contributing substantially to occupational sex segregation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-75691-x
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational sex segregation is strongly predicted by psychological sex differences

Agneta Herlitz, Björn N. Persson, Kimmo Sorjonen, Kåre Hedebrant et al.
Scientific Reports
Career Development and Diversity
article

Occupational sex segregation is strongly predicted by psychological sex differences

Agneta Herlitz, Björn N. Persson, Kimmo Sorjonen, Kåre Hedebrant, Mikael Lundqvist, Joakim K. E. Frostegård
article en

Abstract

Abstract If traits of individuals are associated with occupational choice, sex differences in those traits should be associated with sex differences in occupational choice, and consequently, with occupational sex segregation. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the extent to which this is the case for spatial ability, verbal ability, agreeableness, emotional stability, interest in people and interest in things, across 429 occupations. Participants ( N = 2,576, aged 35–45) completed online tests and questionnaires, while students rated occupational requirements. For each occupation, the population sex composition of people with traits in line with requirements was estimated, using trait sex differences and occupational requirement profiles. Estimates were highly predictive of actual population sex ratios, with the model assessing interest and cognition in conjunction explaining the most variance ( R 2 = .49), followed by the interest model ( R 2 = .46) and the cognition model ( R 2 = .18). Among individual traits, sex differences in interest in things were by far the most predictive ( R 2 = .42). Notably, sex differences in cognition were more predictive of high proportions of men in occupations than high proportions of women. Given lifespan trait stability, these results suggest that cognition and interests matter in occupational choice, with sex differences consequently contributing substantially to occupational sex segregation.

Scientific Reports
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon