The Role of “Understanding” in Human Cognitive Architecture: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective

Abstract Within cognitive load theory, understanding is a process in which meaning is constructed by “chunking” the multiple elements that constitute high element interactivity material into a single element that is stored in long-term memory. That process does not occur for low element interactivity material to which the term “understanding” is never applied even if the material is difficult to learn due to its bulk. Based on human cognitive architecture, understanding is thus assumed to have occurred when working memory can easily process high element interactivity information as a single chunked element or a relatively small number of elements, depending on learners’ expertise. This paper discusses the integration of understanding into human cognitive architecture within a cognitive load theory framework along with educational implications suggested by cognitive load theory-based instructional designs for understanding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10233-5
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of “Understanding” in Human Cognitive Architecture: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective

John Sweller, Ouhao Chen, Nadine Marcus
Educational Psychology Review
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

The Role of “Understanding” in Human Cognitive Architecture: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective

John Sweller, Ouhao Chen, Nadine Marcus
article en

Abstract

Abstract Within cognitive load theory, understanding is a process in which meaning is constructed by “chunking” the multiple elements that constitute high element interactivity material into a single element that is stored in long-term memory. That process does not occur for low element interactivity material to which the term “understanding” is never applied even if the material is difficult to learn due to its bulk. Based on human cognitive architecture, understanding is thus assumed to have occurred when working memory can easily process high element interactivity information as a single chunked element or a relatively small number of elements, depending on learners’ expertise. This paper discusses the integration of understanding into human cognitive architecture within a cognitive load theory framework along with educational implications suggested by cognitive load theory-based instructional designs for understanding.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 38(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Role of “Understanding” in Human Cognitive Architecture: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective — John Sweller, Ouhao Chen, et al. · Educational Psychology Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS