Sexual Dimorphism and Allometric Variation in the Human Coxal Bone from Two Coeval Italian Skeletal Samples

Sexual dimorphism of the human pelvis is well documented, but the extent to which different factors contribute to pelvic variation remains debated. This study assessed whether allometric scaling contributes to pelvic morphology and whether these patterns differ between sexes and populations. 19 metric measurements from 132 coxal bones from the two coeval Documented Human Osteological Collections of Bologna and Sassari (Italy) were used as dimorphic variables. Maximum femoral length and femoral head diameter were collected and their geometric mean was calculated as a proxy for body size. Standardized Major Axis analysis was performed to assess static allometry. Longitudinal measurements follow allometric scaling, indicating that individuals with larger body size tend to have proportionally larger hip dimensions. Some measurements related to coxal bone depth scale with body size only in males, suggesting that factors beyond allometric scaling (e.g., obstetric demands) may contribute to female pelvic morphology. Other variables display divergent trends between populations or sexes. Differences in allometric patterns between Bologna and Sassari may reflect population-specific environmental (peninsula vs. island), lifestyle and genetic factors. Our findings highlight the role of allometry in pelvic sexual dimorphism, with variable degrees of size dependence across traits, suggesting a potentially modular organization of pelvic morphology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humans
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/humans6040038
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexual Dimorphism and Allometric Variation in the Human Coxal Bone from Two Coeval Italian Skeletal Samples

Annalisa Pietrobelli, Maria Giovanna Belcastro, Teresa Nicolosi, Carla Figus et al.
Humans
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Sexual Dimorphism and Allometric Variation in the Human Coxal Bone from Two Coeval Italian Skeletal Samples

Annalisa Pietrobelli, Maria Giovanna Belcastro, Teresa Nicolosi, Carla Figus, Rita Sorrentino, Davide Mameli, Silvia Volpe, MARTINA COLA
article en

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism of the human pelvis is well documented, but the extent to which different factors contribute to pelvic variation remains debated. This study assessed whether allometric scaling contributes to pelvic morphology and whether these patterns differ between sexes and populations. 19 metric measurements from 132 coxal bones from the two coeval Documented Human Osteological Collections of Bologna and Sassari (Italy) were used as dimorphic variables. Maximum femoral length and femoral head diameter were collected and their geometric mean was calculated as a proxy for body size. Standardized Major Axis analysis was performed to assess static allometry. Longitudinal measurements follow allometric scaling, indicating that individuals with larger body size tend to have proportionally larger hip dimensions. Some measurements related to coxal bone depth scale with body size only in males, suggesting that factors beyond allometric scaling (e.g., obstetric demands) may contribute to female pelvic morphology. Other variables display divergent trends between populations or sexes. Differences in allometric patterns between Bologna and Sassari may reflect population-specific environmental (peninsula vs. island), lifestyle and genetic factors. Our findings highlight the role of allometry in pelvic sexual dimorphism, with variable degrees of size dependence across traits, suggesting a potentially modular organization of pelvic morphology.

HumansVol. 6(4)
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), University of Palermo (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon