Dynamically Weighted Fusion of Daily Multi-Source Precipitation Products over the Haihe River Basin Using a Physically Constrained Two-Stage Framework

Daily precipitation estimates over the Haihe River Basin show strong terrain-related error contrasts. We developed a regional two-stage post-processing fusion workflow for five gridded precipitation products. Physically constrained XGBoost-Tweedie regression uses non-negativity and an archive-derived MaxPrec reference to generate a bias-corrected candidate, ENS_Reg. Dynamic Classification Probability Weighting (DCPW) then uses classifier softmax outputs to weight ENS_Reg and the five original products, producing ENS_RegCla. Models were developed using 2000–2018 data and evaluated on 357,134 station-day records from 2019 to 2023. With the original 1961–2022 MaxPrec reference, ENS_RegCla achieved MAE = 1.064 mm/day, RMSE = 4.807 mm/day, R2 = 0.666, and KGE = 0.746. MAE was 12.6–15.3% lower than for the evaluated equal-weight, inverse-error, and neighborhood error-variance weighting baselines. At a 0.1 mm/day threshold, CSI = 0.653 and HSS = 0.720 exceeded the two specified ablations. Grouped RMSE favored the ablations, whereas grouped MAE differences were not robust. Restricting MaxPrec to 1961–2018 retained better MAE, RMSE, and KGE than all five original products. However, CSI/HSS fell to 0.633/0.698, approximately matching GSMaP-Gauge in CSI but falling below its HSS. The event-skill advantage over the ablation without MaxPrec nearly disappeared, indicating strong dependence on the reference period. Full-sample evaluation included both training and temporal-evaluation periods and yielded pooled MAE = 0.677 mm/day and KGE = 0.783. Of the 2,004,598 full-sample records, 1,647,464 (82.2%) were from model development. GTCH provided an assumption-limited relative-uncertainty diagnostic; the lower minimum statistic after candidate-set expansion was interpreted descriptively, without establishing true uncertainty reduction. Candidate errors may be correlated because ENS_Reg is derived from the original products. The framework supports condition-aware regional precipitation reconstruction, while moderate and heavy rainfall remain priorities for refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18213631
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamically Weighted Fusion of Daily Multi-Source Precipitation Products over the Haihe River Basin Using a Physically Constrained Two-Stage Framework

Hao Chen, Shuyang Xia
Remote Sensing
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

Dynamically Weighted Fusion of Daily Multi-Source Precipitation Products over the Haihe River Basin Using a Physically Constrained Two-Stage Framework

Hao Chen, Shuyang Xia
article en

Abstract

Daily precipitation estimates over the Haihe River Basin show strong terrain-related error contrasts. We developed a regional two-stage post-processing fusion workflow for five gridded precipitation products. Physically constrained XGBoost-Tweedie regression uses non-negativity and an archive-derived MaxPrec reference to generate a bias-corrected candidate, ENS_Reg. Dynamic Classification Probability Weighting (DCPW) then uses classifier softmax outputs to weight ENS_Reg and the five original products, producing ENS_RegCla. Models were developed using 2000–2018 data and evaluated on 357,134 station-day records from 2019 to 2023. With the original 1961–2022 MaxPrec reference, ENS_RegCla achieved MAE = 1.064 mm/day, RMSE = 4.807 mm/day, R2 = 0.666, and KGE = 0.746. MAE was 12.6–15.3% lower than for the evaluated equal-weight, inverse-error, and neighborhood error-variance weighting baselines. At a 0.1 mm/day threshold, CSI = 0.653 and HSS = 0.720 exceeded the two specified ablations. Grouped RMSE favored the ablations, whereas grouped MAE differences were not robust. Restricting MaxPrec to 1961–2018 retained better MAE, RMSE, and KGE than all five original products. However, CSI/HSS fell to 0.633/0.698, approximately matching GSMaP-Gauge in CSI but falling below its HSS. The event-skill advantage over the ablation without MaxPrec nearly disappeared, indicating strong dependence on the reference period. Full-sample evaluation included both training and temporal-evaluation periods and yielded pooled MAE = 0.677 mm/day and KGE = 0.783. Of the 2,004,598 full-sample records, 1,647,464 (82.2%) were from model development. GTCH provided an assumption-limited relative-uncertainty diagnostic; the lower minimum statistic after candidate-set expansion was interpreted descriptively, without establishing true uncertainty reduction. Candidate errors may be correlated because ENS_Reg is derived from the original products. The framework supports condition-aware regional precipitation reconstruction, while moderate and heavy rainfall remain priorities for refinement.

Remote SensingVol. 18(21)
Tianjin Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Dynamically Weighted Fusion of Daily Multi-Source Precipitation Products over the Haihe River Basin Using a Physically Constrained Two-Stage Framework — Hao Chen, Shuyang Xia · Remote Sensing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS