Navigating Complexity Through Mixed Methods Research: Insights from a Large-Scale Interdisciplinary Environmental Study of Biodiversity and Human Wellbeing

This paper explores the challenge of navigating complexity within mixed methods research process, drawing on a large-scale interdisciplinary environmental project exploring the wellbeing dimensions of human interaction with woodland biodiversity. Reflecting on the design and implementation of a multiphase mixed methods project involving over 9,000 participants, we examine how complexity emerged through the phenomenon under investigation, the structure of the research design, and the collaborations through which knowledge was produced. The study integrated diverse methods, data sources, and analytical approaches across two phases of inquiry, generating diverse outputs. Beyond field-specific methodological innovations, we argue that large-scale interdisciplinary environmental research provides a productive context for understanding the emergence, operation, and methodological value of complex mixed methods designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898261491475
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Complexity Through Mixed Methods Research: Insights from a Large-Scale Interdisciplinary Environmental Study of Biodiversity and Human Wellbeing

Jessica Claris Fisher, Katherine Nesbitt Irvine, Martin Dallimer, Robert D. Fish et al.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Navigating Complexity Through Mixed Methods Research: Insights from a Large-Scale Interdisciplinary Environmental Study of Biodiversity and Human Wellbeing

Jessica Claris Fisher, Katherine Nesbitt Irvine, Martin Dallimer, Robert D. Fish, Holly McKelvey, Gail E. Austen, Zoe Georgina Davies, Peter M. King
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the challenge of navigating complexity within mixed methods research process, drawing on a large-scale interdisciplinary environmental project exploring the wellbeing dimensions of human interaction with woodland biodiversity. Reflecting on the design and implementation of a multiphase mixed methods project involving over 9,000 participants, we examine how complexity emerged through the phenomenon under investigation, the structure of the research design, and the collaborations through which knowledge was produced. The study integrated diverse methods, data sources, and analytical approaches across two phases of inquiry, generating diverse outputs. Beyond field-specific methodological innovations, we argue that large-scale interdisciplinary environmental research provides a productive context for understanding the emergence, operation, and methodological value of complex mixed methods designs.

Journal of Mixed Methods Research
University of Leeds (GB), James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Kent (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Navigating Complexity Through Mixed Methods Research: Insights from a Large-Scale Interdisciplinary Environmental Study of Biodiversity and Human Wellbeing — Jessica Claris Fisher, Katherine Nesbitt Irvine, et al. · Journal of Mixed Methods Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS