Learning mathematics in distracting environments

I suggest that digital distraction fosters unequal learning environments for mathematics. This is because learning mathematics is particularly vulnerable to distraction due to the high working memory load required for mathematical problem-solving. At the same time, there is socioeconomic variance in people’s executive functions, including working memory resources. Because of these reasons, I argue that digital distraction should be seen as an obstacle to learning mathematics for learners who come from vulnerable backgrounds. According to Peter Westen’s (1985) three-part analysis of opportunity in equality of opportunity, to guarantee equality of opportunity, obstacles that target already vulnerable groups should be kept to a minimum. By applying Westen’s analysis to this issue, I further argue that achieving equal opportunity for learning mathematics entails limiting digital distraction in the mathematics classroom. On this basis, I then present normative criteria for evaluating the permissibility of digital distraction in learning situations in general.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics and Education
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2026.2752589
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning mathematics in distracting environments

Kaisa Kärki
Ethics and Education
Digital Media and Philosophy
article

Learning mathematics in distracting environments

Kaisa Kärki
article en

Abstract

I suggest that digital distraction fosters unequal learning environments for mathematics. This is because learning mathematics is particularly vulnerable to distraction due to the high working memory load required for mathematical problem-solving. At the same time, there is socioeconomic variance in people’s executive functions, including working memory resources. Because of these reasons, I argue that digital distraction should be seen as an obstacle to learning mathematics for learners who come from vulnerable backgrounds. According to Peter Westen’s (1985) three-part analysis of opportunity in equality of opportunity, to guarantee equality of opportunity, obstacles that target already vulnerable groups should be kept to a minimum. By applying Westen’s analysis to this issue, I further argue that achieving equal opportunity for learning mathematics entails limiting digital distraction in the mathematics classroom. On this basis, I then present normative criteria for evaluating the permissibility of digital distraction in learning situations in general.

Ethics and Education
University of Helsinki (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Media and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon