Wearable technology in tennis: Player willingness, use and application

Understanding players’ acceptance of wearable technologies is essential for translating research advancements into practical use in tennis. This study therefore aimed to characterise tennis players’ current wearable use, application interests, acceptable sensor numbers and locations, and factors shaping their willingness to wear sensors during training and match play. The study also examined whether the maximum acceptable number of sensors differed according to current wearable-use status, playing context, and playing level. Ninety-six tennis players from university to professional levels, currently training in the United Kingdom, China, Australia and Ireland, completed the survey. Heart rate monitors and GPS-based trackers dominated training adoption, whereas inertial measurement units were less used; reported use was lower during match play across all device types. Players exhibited strong interest in performance-oriented applications, particularly stroke-load monitoring, technical feedback, and injury prevention. Acceptance was context-dependent, with higher tolerance for multiple sensors during training than match play. Sensor-experienced players reported a higher maximum acceptable sensor number during training than sensor-inexperienced players (median [IQR]: 5 [3-8] vs 3 [2-6]), whereas match play acceptability was similar between groups. Upper-back, shoe, and lower-back placements were preferred, whereas hand-, wrist-, and racket-mounted sensors were the least acceptable. Movement interference, discomfort and wearability, and sensor placement concerns were the main reasons for non-use. These findings highlight player-valued features and constraints that should inform wearable technology design and future on-court sensor research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261498581
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wearable technology in tennis: Player willingness, use and application

Mark A. King, Stuart A. McErlain‐Naylor, Anna Fitzpatrick, Xi Yang
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

Wearable technology in tennis: Player willingness, use and application

Mark A. King, Stuart A. McErlain‐Naylor, Anna Fitzpatrick, Xi Yang
article en

Abstract

Understanding players’ acceptance of wearable technologies is essential for translating research advancements into practical use in tennis. This study therefore aimed to characterise tennis players’ current wearable use, application interests, acceptable sensor numbers and locations, and factors shaping their willingness to wear sensors during training and match play. The study also examined whether the maximum acceptable number of sensors differed according to current wearable-use status, playing context, and playing level. Ninety-six tennis players from university to professional levels, currently training in the United Kingdom, China, Australia and Ireland, completed the survey. Heart rate monitors and GPS-based trackers dominated training adoption, whereas inertial measurement units were less used; reported use was lower during match play across all device types. Players exhibited strong interest in performance-oriented applications, particularly stroke-load monitoring, technical feedback, and injury prevention. Acceptance was context-dependent, with higher tolerance for multiple sensors during training than match play. Sensor-experienced players reported a higher maximum acceptable sensor number during training than sensor-inexperienced players (median [IQR]: 5 [3-8] vs 3 [2-6]), whereas match play acceptability was similar between groups. Upper-back, shoe, and lower-back placements were preferred, whereas hand-, wrist-, and racket-mounted sensors were the least acceptable. Movement interference, discomfort and wearability, and sensor placement concerns were the main reasons for non-use. These findings highlight player-valued features and constraints that should inform wearable technology design and future on-court sensor research.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Loughborough University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Wearable technology in tennis: Player willingness, use and application — Mark A. King, Stuart A. McErlain‐Naylor, et al. · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS