Not Even Newton's Word: Authority and Resistance in the Royal Society Corpus 1

Abstract This paper investigates the historical development of Isaac Newton's proposed distinction between mass and weight in the Principia Mathematica of 1687 and traces its fate in the scientific English of the Royal Society between 1700 and 1920. Prior to Newton's differentiation in the Principia, weight was a polysemous lemma encoding various meanings, one of which Newton lexicalised to mass. This created a precisely datable instance of deliberate semantic reform. The study asks how far this proposal spread through scientific writing and what patterns of usage appear in the texts that record its adoption or resistance. To assess this, the study uses diachronic frequency analysis, Conditional Inference Trees, and Random Forests to assess the relative influence of linguistic and extralinguistic factors on lexical choice. The results show that the distinction between mass and weight did not diffuse uniformly. Authorial practice, disciplinary subfield and the referent object emerge as the strongest predictors of usage. These findings shed light on the history of scientific vocabulary and on the dynamics of deliberate semantic innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Philological Society
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.70044
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not Even Newton's Word: Authority and Resistance in the Royal Society Corpus 1

Nina Haket
Transactions of the Philological Society
linguistics and terminology studies
article

Not Even Newton's Word: Authority and Resistance in the Royal Society Corpus 1

Nina Haket
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the historical development of Isaac Newton's proposed distinction between mass and weight in the Principia Mathematica of 1687 and traces its fate in the scientific English of the Royal Society between 1700 and 1920. Prior to Newton's differentiation in the Principia, weight was a polysemous lemma encoding various meanings, one of which Newton lexicalised to mass. This created a precisely datable instance of deliberate semantic reform. The study asks how far this proposal spread through scientific writing and what patterns of usage appear in the texts that record its adoption or resistance. To assess this, the study uses diachronic frequency analysis, Conditional Inference Trees, and Random Forests to assess the relative influence of linguistic and extralinguistic factors on lexical choice. The results show that the distinction between mass and weight did not diffuse uniformly. Authorial practice, disciplinary subfield and the referent object emerge as the strongest predictors of usage. These findings shed light on the history of scientific vocabulary and on the dynamics of deliberate semantic innovation.

Transactions of the Philological Society
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Not Even Newton's Word: Authority and Resistance in the Royal Society Corpus 1 — Nina Haket · Transactions of the Philological Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS