The Ecosystems Metaphor in Management Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Bridging Disciplines

This essay examines the widespread use of “ecosystem” as a metaphor in management education, arguing that while seemingly illuminating, it creates confusion for students who must reconcile business terminology with natural ecology, ultimately impeding their ability to understand both business sustainability and natural systems. We demonstrate how the term perpetuates potentially harmful misconceptions about both business and ecological systems, hampering progress toward sustainable business practices. By exploring five key areas where business and natural ecosystems fundamentally diverge—embeddedness, adaptation, agency, temporal-spatial scales, and trophic mapping—we show how adopting a social-ecological systems approach can better connect management and ecology. We propose new methods for approaching curriculum design and classroom instruction that can enhance students’ understanding of the natural world and the role that businesses can play in addressing our urgent ecological challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Behavior Teaching Review
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629261496461
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ecosystems Metaphor in Management Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Bridging Disciplines

Erik Noyes, Kristen M. Getchell, Vikki L. Rodgers, Jonathan Sims
Organizational Behavior Teaching Review
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

The Ecosystems Metaphor in Management Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Bridging Disciplines

Erik Noyes, Kristen M. Getchell, Vikki L. Rodgers, Jonathan Sims
article en

Abstract

This essay examines the widespread use of “ecosystem” as a metaphor in management education, arguing that while seemingly illuminating, it creates confusion for students who must reconcile business terminology with natural ecology, ultimately impeding their ability to understand both business sustainability and natural systems. We demonstrate how the term perpetuates potentially harmful misconceptions about both business and ecological systems, hampering progress toward sustainable business practices. By exploring five key areas where business and natural ecosystems fundamentally diverge—embeddedness, adaptation, agency, temporal-spatial scales, and trophic mapping—we show how adopting a social-ecological systems approach can better connect management and ecology. We propose new methods for approaching curriculum design and classroom instruction that can enhance students’ understanding of the natural world and the role that businesses can play in addressing our urgent ecological challenges.

Organizational Behavior Teaching Review
Babson College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon