Multi-planar reconstruction and 3D volume rendering as tools of anatomical dissection and morphometry on the example of cadaveric study of inferior medial genicular artery

Abstract Cadaveric dissection is a traditional method used to reveal deep-seated anatomical structures; however, it is inherently time-consuming and irreversible, preventing the correction of procedural errors. To address these limitations, this study presents a novel computer-assisted dissection framework designed to accelerate workflow, allow error mitigation, and enable repeatable analysis of a single specimen. Four independent investigators performed virtual dissections of the inferior medial genicular artery across two DICOM viewing platforms: RadiANT DICOM Viewer 2025.2 (64-bit) and Horos v4.0.0 RC5. Morphometric measurements were recorded at predefined reference points corresponding to arterial branching sites. Inter-observer variability was evaluated, and the resulting dataset was validated against multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) metrics—the standard radiological benchmark for vascular assessment. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between three-dimensional volume rendering (3D VR) and MPR in assessing vessel dimensions for structures with a diameter exceeding \(\:0.950\text{\:mm}\) (\(\:{d}_{\text{MPR}}=0.950\text{\:mm}\)). For vessels > 0.95 mm, 3‑D VR and MPR yielded no statistically significant difference (p = 0.086), a strong Pearson correlation (r = 0.971), and a Bland‑Altman mean bias of − 0.03 mm (95% LoA: − 0.14 to + 0.07 mm). Furthermore, morphological consistency was maintained regardless of vessel caliber. The findings demonstrate that the integration of 3D VR and MPR modalities offers a highly reproducible, non-invasive tool for both educational and research applications in vascular analysis. Moreover, these measurements exhibit strong stability across different software platforms and operators, showing an absence of systematic bias with only minor variations attributable to human error or minor misalignment. Aim of study Establishing the credibility of 3D VR as a tool for anatomical assay creates a possibility of using simpler, more available, efficient and reusable techniques for education, research and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-026-04046-y
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Multi-planar reconstruction and 3D volume rendering as tools of anatomical dissection and morphometry on the example of cadaveric study of inferior medial genicular artery

Robert Śmigıelski, Bogdan Ciszek, Pawel Gebski, Beata Ciszkowska-Łysoń et al.
1 links
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Multi-planar reconstruction and 3D volume rendering as tools of anatomical dissection and morphometry on the example of cadaveric study of inferior medial genicular artery

Robert Śmigıelski, Bogdan Ciszek, Pawel Gebski, Beata Ciszkowska-Łysoń, Julia Szopa, Laura Fortuna, Filip Lipiński
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cadaveric dissection is a traditional method used to reveal deep-seated anatomical structures; however, it is inherently time-consuming and irreversible, preventing the correction of procedural errors. To address these limitations, this study presents a novel computer-assisted dissection framework designed to accelerate workflow, allow error mitigation, and enable repeatable analysis of a single specimen. Four independent investigators performed virtual dissections of the inferior medial genicular artery across two DICOM viewing platforms: RadiANT DICOM Viewer 2025.2 (64-bit) and Horos v4.0.0 RC5. Morphometric measurements were recorded at predefined reference points corresponding to arterial branching sites. Inter-observer variability was evaluated, and the resulting dataset was validated against multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) metrics—the standard radiological benchmark for vascular assessment. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between three-dimensional volume rendering (3D VR) and MPR in assessing vessel dimensions for structures with a diameter exceeding \(\:0.950\text{\:mm}\) (\(\:{d}_{\text{MPR}}=0.950\text{\:mm}\)). For vessels > 0.95 mm, 3‑D VR and MPR yielded no statistically significant difference (p = 0.086), a strong Pearson correlation (r = 0.971), and a Bland‑Altman mean bias of − 0.03 mm (95% LoA: − 0.14 to + 0.07 mm). Furthermore, morphological consistency was maintained regardless of vessel caliber. The findings demonstrate that the integration of 3D VR and MPR modalities offers a highly reproducible, non-invasive tool for both educational and research applications in vascular analysis. Moreover, these measurements exhibit strong stability across different software platforms and operators, showing an absence of systematic bias with only minor variations attributable to human error or minor misalignment. Aim of study Establishing the credibility of 3D VR as a tool for anatomical assay creates a possibility of using simpler, more available, efficient and reusable techniques for education, research and clinical practice.

Surgical and Radiologic AnatomyVol. 48(1)
Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
Good health and well-being
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon