SPARE-RAG: Evidence Repair and Verification-Guided Sequential Neural Pruning for Multi-Hop RAG

Multi-hop RAG requires complementary facts from multiple documents to form a complete evidence chain. Relevance-based passage selection can miss bridging evidence, while adding more passages can introduce redundancy and distractors. Context compression reduces input length but does not, by itself, establish that the remaining evidence supports all required reasoning steps. We propose SPARE-RAG, which combines evidence repair with verification-guided sequential neural pruning. The key insight is to first repair missing support and then assess each proposed deletion by its effect on the remaining evidence set. Within a fixed candidate pool, the framework first supplements missing support, then proposes passage deletions and checks the remaining evidence before accepting or rejecting each proposed deletion. Experiments on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue with frozen Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct show that SPARE-RAG consistently outperforms the compared methods in answer and evidence quality, achieving Answer F1 scores of 70.27, 52.49, and 35.68, respectively. These results demonstrate that combining evidence repair with verified sequential pruning improves both evidence quality and downstream answer generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17101052
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SPARE-RAG: Evidence Repair and Verification-Guided Sequential Neural Pruning for Multi-Hop RAG

Jieyan Liu, Ziyao Guo, Ke Zhang, Yuhao Huang et al.
Information
Topic Modeling
article

SPARE-RAG: Evidence Repair and Verification-Guided Sequential Neural Pruning for Multi-Hop RAG

Jieyan Liu, Ziyao Guo, Ke Zhang, Yuhao Huang, Yixuan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Multi-hop RAG requires complementary facts from multiple documents to form a complete evidence chain. Relevance-based passage selection can miss bridging evidence, while adding more passages can introduce redundancy and distractors. Context compression reduces input length but does not, by itself, establish that the remaining evidence supports all required reasoning steps. We propose SPARE-RAG, which combines evidence repair with verification-guided sequential neural pruning. The key insight is to first repair missing support and then assess each proposed deletion by its effect on the remaining evidence set. Within a fixed candidate pool, the framework first supplements missing support, then proposes passage deletions and checks the remaining evidence before accepting or rejecting each proposed deletion. Experiments on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue with frozen Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct show that SPARE-RAG consistently outperforms the compared methods in answer and evidence quality, achieving Answer F1 scores of 70.27, 52.49, and 35.68, respectively. These results demonstrate that combining evidence repair with verified sequential pruning improves both evidence quality and downstream answer generation.

InformationVol. 17(10)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon