A clinically conditional deep learning model for predicting histological subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors from hematoxylin-eosin whole-slide images

Histological subtype classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors is important for prognostic assessment and therapeutic decision-making. However, current subtype classification relies heavily on extensive immunohistochemistry, which can be time-consuming, costly, and tissue-consuming. We aimed to develop a clinically conditional deep learning model that integrates routinely available clinical features with hematoxylin-eosin-stained whole-slide images to predict five subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. To address the histomorphologic characteristics of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, we designed an automatic pathology-informed patch selection strategy focusing on diagnostically relevant tumor regions, and applied a masking strategy to simulate missing clinical features. Model performance was evaluated using ensemble inference from five cross-validated models on an internal test set and a temporal and external validation set. Models were assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, with 95% confidence intervals. Paired DeLong and McNemar tests were used to compare models, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Attention heatmaps were visualized for interpretability. On the internal hold-out test set, the clinically conditional model achieved an overall accuracy of 91.8% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.934, outperforming the unimodal WSIs model (accuracy, 87.3%; AUC, 0.905; P < 0.05). On the temporal and external validation set, the clinically conditional model achieved an overall accuracy of 86.9% and an AUC of 0.901, also surpassing the unimodal model based only on WSIs (accuracy, 84.6%; AUC, 0.868; P < 0.05). Interpretability analyses showed that model attention was concentrated in morphologically meaningful regions and that the decision process was similar to recognized pathological features of individual PitNETs subtypes. These preliminary findings suggest that integrating clinical feature with histopathology may better simulate the comprehensive reasoning process of pathologists in routine diagnoses. This exploratory approach could potentially serve as a supplementary decision-support tool to facilitate ancillary test prioritization, optimize diagnostic workflow, and improve resource allocation, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03918-y
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A clinically conditional deep learning model for predicting histological subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors from hematoxylin-eosin whole-slide images

Xijin Hua, Run Lin, Hualiang Xiao, Caiqi Chen et al.
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
AI in cancer detection
article

A clinically conditional deep learning model for predicting histological subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors from hematoxylin-eosin whole-slide images

Xijin Hua, Run Lin, Hualiang Xiao, Caiqi Chen, Aiping Zheng, Lianhua Zhao
article en

Abstract

Histological subtype classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors is important for prognostic assessment and therapeutic decision-making. However, current subtype classification relies heavily on extensive immunohistochemistry, which can be time-consuming, costly, and tissue-consuming. We aimed to develop a clinically conditional deep learning model that integrates routinely available clinical features with hematoxylin-eosin-stained whole-slide images to predict five subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. To address the histomorphologic characteristics of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, we designed an automatic pathology-informed patch selection strategy focusing on diagnostically relevant tumor regions, and applied a masking strategy to simulate missing clinical features. Model performance was evaluated using ensemble inference from five cross-validated models on an internal test set and a temporal and external validation set. Models were assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, with 95% confidence intervals. Paired DeLong and McNemar tests were used to compare models, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Attention heatmaps were visualized for interpretability. On the internal hold-out test set, the clinically conditional model achieved an overall accuracy of 91.8% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.934, outperforming the unimodal WSIs model (accuracy, 87.3%; AUC, 0.905; P < 0.05). On the temporal and external validation set, the clinically conditional model achieved an overall accuracy of 86.9% and an AUC of 0.901, also surpassing the unimodal model based only on WSIs (accuracy, 84.6%; AUC, 0.868; P < 0.05). Interpretability analyses showed that model attention was concentrated in morphologically meaningful regions and that the decision process was similar to recognized pathological features of individual PitNETs subtypes. These preliminary findings suggest that integrating clinical feature with histopathology may better simulate the comprehensive reasoning process of pathologists in routine diagnoses. This exploratory approach could potentially serve as a supplementary decision-support tool to facilitate ancillary test prioritization, optimize diagnostic workflow, and improve resource allocation, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Army Medical University (CN), University of Exeter (GB), Daping Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon