The effect of rehardening methods/storage environment on the delayed bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel

Rehardening/remineralizing agents have been suggested to reverse the adverse effects of bleaching on the enamel. This research compared the effects of different nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) combinations, artificial saliva alone, or with pH cycling on delayed shear bond strength (SBS) to in-office bleached enamel. In this in-vitro experimental study, ninety extracted intact premolars with the flattened enamel surface were randomly divided into nine groups: Group 1 (No-bleach) served as negative control; the others were bleached with 40% hydrogen peroxide; Group 2 (bleach/Immediate bond) immediate resin bonding; in groups 3 to 9, resin bonding was carried out after three weeks; Group 3 (bleach/Distilled Water), storage in distilled water; Group 4 (bleach/Saliva), storage in artificial saliva; Groups 5 (bleach/Removal), after storage, 0.5 mm removal of enamel; Group 6 (bleach /Dem-Rem) one-week pH-cycling followed by two-week storage in saliva; Group 7 (bleach/NHA), one-week application of nanohydroxyapatite followed by two-week storage in saliva; Group 8 (bleach/NHA-RI), resin infiltration after NHA treatment; Group 9 (bleach/NHA-CH), one-week application of nanohydroxyapatite-chitosan combination followed by two-week storage in saliva. After 24 h, SBS was measured. Immediate bonding resulted in the lowest SBS (13.67 ± 1.97 MPa; P < 0.001). Among the 3-week delayed groups, Dem-Rem (27.61 ± 2.5) and NHA (26.91 ± 1.23) showed significantly higher SBS than distilled water (19.79 ± 1.76), removal (23.86 ± 1.48), and NHA-RI (21.19 ± 1.73) groups ( P < 0.01 for all comparisons). No significant SBS difference was observed between the tested NHA and NHA–chitosan formulations (25.06 ± 2.24 vs. 26.91 ± 1.23 MPa; P = 0.37). Furthermore, the SBS of the Saliva group (25.47 ± 1.69 MPa) was significantly higher than that of the distilled water and NHA-RI groups ( P < 0.001), with no significant differences compared with the remaining delayed-bleached groups. Delayed bonding after NHA or NHA–chitosan treatment resulted in bond strength comparable to that obtained with artificial saliva storage alone or with demineralization–remineralization cycling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-10257-x
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of rehardening methods/storage environment on the delayed bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel

Fereshteh Shafıei, Zahra Lotf Haghpanah, Maryam Sadat Tavangar
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

The effect of rehardening methods/storage environment on the delayed bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel

Fereshteh Shafıei, Zahra Lotf Haghpanah, Maryam Sadat Tavangar
article en

Abstract

Rehardening/remineralizing agents have been suggested to reverse the adverse effects of bleaching on the enamel. This research compared the effects of different nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) combinations, artificial saliva alone, or with pH cycling on delayed shear bond strength (SBS) to in-office bleached enamel. In this in-vitro experimental study, ninety extracted intact premolars with the flattened enamel surface were randomly divided into nine groups: Group 1 (No-bleach) served as negative control; the others were bleached with 40% hydrogen peroxide; Group 2 (bleach/Immediate bond) immediate resin bonding; in groups 3 to 9, resin bonding was carried out after three weeks; Group 3 (bleach/Distilled Water), storage in distilled water; Group 4 (bleach/Saliva), storage in artificial saliva; Groups 5 (bleach/Removal), after storage, 0.5 mm removal of enamel; Group 6 (bleach /Dem-Rem) one-week pH-cycling followed by two-week storage in saliva; Group 7 (bleach/NHA), one-week application of nanohydroxyapatite followed by two-week storage in saliva; Group 8 (bleach/NHA-RI), resin infiltration after NHA treatment; Group 9 (bleach/NHA-CH), one-week application of nanohydroxyapatite-chitosan combination followed by two-week storage in saliva. After 24 h, SBS was measured. Immediate bonding resulted in the lowest SBS (13.67 ± 1.97 MPa; P < 0.001). Among the 3-week delayed groups, Dem-Rem (27.61 ± 2.5) and NHA (26.91 ± 1.23) showed significantly higher SBS than distilled water (19.79 ± 1.76), removal (23.86 ± 1.48), and NHA-RI (21.19 ± 1.73) groups ( P < 0.01 for all comparisons). No significant SBS difference was observed between the tested NHA and NHA–chitosan formulations (25.06 ± 2.24 vs. 26.91 ± 1.23 MPa; P = 0.37). Furthermore, the SBS of the Saliva group (25.47 ± 1.69 MPa) was significantly higher than that of the distilled water and NHA-RI groups ( P < 0.001), with no significant differences compared with the remaining delayed-bleached groups. Delayed bonding after NHA or NHA–chitosan treatment resulted in bond strength comparable to that obtained with artificial saliva storage alone or with demineralization–remineralization cycling.

BMC Oral Health
Shiraz University (IR), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon