Preserving the Dialysis Lifeline: An Updated Review on Central Venous Stenosis

Central venous stenosis (CVS) is an under-recognized yet clinically consequential complication of hemodialysis care, threatening vascular access function, limiting future access options, and contributing to substantial morbidity in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Although often detected only after access dysfunction or venous hypertension becomes clinically apparent, CVS represents the cumulative consequence of biologic, mechanical, and hemodynamic injury to the central venous circulation. In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence on the epidemiology, pathobiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of CVS in hemodialysis patients, with emphasis on translational links between venous injury and clinical access failure. Central venous catheters, cardiac implantable electronic device leads, peripherally inserted central catheters, and high-flow arteriovenous access can initiate endothelial disruption, inflammation, thrombosis, and maladaptive neointimal hyperplasia. These processes are amplified by the uremic milieu, oxidative stress, impaired endothelial repair, and vascular smooth-muscle cell activation, providing a mechanistic basis for recurrent stenosis after intervention. Diagnosis requires integration of clinical suspicion with imaging, including duplex ultrasound, CT or MR venography, and catheter-based venography, which remains the procedural reference standard and enables immediate treatment. Endovascular therapy, particularly percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with selective stent placement, remains the cornerstone of management for symptomatic disease; however, elastic recoil, restenosis, and repeated reintervention continue to limit long-term durability. Emerging strategies, including drug-coated balloons, intravascular ultrasound-guided intervention, dedicated venous stents, and biologically targeted approaches, may improve outcomes but require further validation. Prevention through catheter avoidance, optimal device planning, early recognition, and multidisciplinary access stewardship remains central to preserving the hemodialysis lifeline. A mechanism-informed approach to CVS may help shift care from repeated salvage toward durable access preservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vascular Diseases
Published
2026-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd5050044
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preserving the Dialysis Lifeline: An Updated Review on Central Venous Stenosis

Daphna Bar-Nur, Suvranu Ganguli, Kelsey HonShideler, Vipul Chimanlal Chitalia et al.
Journal of Vascular Diseases
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Preserving the Dialysis Lifeline: An Updated Review on Central Venous Stenosis

Daphna Bar-Nur, Suvranu Ganguli, Kelsey HonShideler, Vipul Chimanlal Chitalia, Curtis HonShideler, Najia Idrees
article en

Abstract

Central venous stenosis (CVS) is an under-recognized yet clinically consequential complication of hemodialysis care, threatening vascular access function, limiting future access options, and contributing to substantial morbidity in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Although often detected only after access dysfunction or venous hypertension becomes clinically apparent, CVS represents the cumulative consequence of biologic, mechanical, and hemodynamic injury to the central venous circulation. In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence on the epidemiology, pathobiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of CVS in hemodialysis patients, with emphasis on translational links between venous injury and clinical access failure. Central venous catheters, cardiac implantable electronic device leads, peripherally inserted central catheters, and high-flow arteriovenous access can initiate endothelial disruption, inflammation, thrombosis, and maladaptive neointimal hyperplasia. These processes are amplified by the uremic milieu, oxidative stress, impaired endothelial repair, and vascular smooth-muscle cell activation, providing a mechanistic basis for recurrent stenosis after intervention. Diagnosis requires integration of clinical suspicion with imaging, including duplex ultrasound, CT or MR venography, and catheter-based venography, which remains the procedural reference standard and enables immediate treatment. Endovascular therapy, particularly percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with selective stent placement, remains the cornerstone of management for symptomatic disease; however, elastic recoil, restenosis, and repeated reintervention continue to limit long-term durability. Emerging strategies, including drug-coated balloons, intravascular ultrasound-guided intervention, dedicated venous stents, and biologically targeted approaches, may improve outcomes but require further validation. Prevention through catheter avoidance, optimal device planning, early recognition, and multidisciplinary access stewardship remains central to preserving the hemodialysis lifeline. A mechanism-informed approach to CVS may help shift care from repeated salvage toward durable access preservation.

Journal of Vascular DiseasesVol. 5(5)
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.