The blurred line between ends and means: how frontline workers factor production attributes into results in performance evaluations

Results-based performance management assumes that organizational performance can be evaluated by defining and measuring desired results. Yet frontline workers, who translate performance goals into service delivery, may interpret results through their knowledge of how services are produced. We examine whether production attributes enter frontline evaluations of formal results. Drawing on theories of sensemaking and cognitive judgment, we argue that task difficulty and effort provide salient cues through which frontline workers contextualize performance information. We test these expectations using a conjoint survey experiment with 1,371 Danish high school teachers, randomly varying production attributes alongside formal results. Teachers rate schools serving more disadvantaged students more favorably and increase ratings when schools demonstrate greater effort. Both effects exhibit clear dose-response patterns, with effort effects comparable to those of formal results. The findings show that frontline evaluations systematically incorporate production information, revealing how performance management can generate divergent understandings of organizational performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Management Review
Published
2026-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2026.2750928
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The blurred line between ends and means: how frontline workers factor production attributes into results in performance evaluations

Paw Hansen
Public Management Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

The blurred line between ends and means: how frontline workers factor production attributes into results in performance evaluations

Paw Hansen
article en

Abstract

Results-based performance management assumes that organizational performance can be evaluated by defining and measuring desired results. Yet frontline workers, who translate performance goals into service delivery, may interpret results through their knowledge of how services are produced. We examine whether production attributes enter frontline evaluations of formal results. Drawing on theories of sensemaking and cognitive judgment, we argue that task difficulty and effort provide salient cues through which frontline workers contextualize performance information. We test these expectations using a conjoint survey experiment with 1,371 Danish high school teachers, randomly varying production attributes alongside formal results. Teachers rate schools serving more disadvantaged students more favorably and increase ratings when schools demonstrate greater effort. Both effects exhibit clear dose-response patterns, with effort effects comparable to those of formal results. The findings show that frontline evaluations systematically incorporate production information, revealing how performance management can generate divergent understandings of organizational performance.

Public Management Review
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research (DK)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The blurred line between ends and means: how frontline workers factor production attributes into results in performance evaluations — Paw Hansen · Public Management Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS