Flourishing-centered AI: designing AI for the multiple goods and tensions of living well

The rapid adoption of AI creates both opportunities and risks for human well-being and flourishing, underscoring the need for an integrative interdisciplinary framework to guide its design and evaluation. We advance a flourishing-centered AI framework that draws together philosophical, behavioral, interactional, and technical perspectives. We conceptualize human flourishing as multidimensional, encompassing subjective well-being, psychological functioning, character virtues, and psychological richness. This broader conception of flourishing extends existing approaches by explicitly incorporating character and other goods, and by confronting the possibility that these goods cannot always be maximized simultaneously. Two cross-cutting tensions arise: a temporal tension concerning immediate versus longer-term benefits, and a self-community tension concerning individual versus collective outcomes. We show how these tensions can be translated from behavioral objectives and measurable outcomes into interactional strategies and technical design choices. We conclude with implications for researchers and developers designing AI systems and for policymakers governing their use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2026.2758626
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flourishing-centered AI: designing AI for the multiple goods and tensions of living well

Ashton Anderson, Louis Tay, Harsh Kumar, Gloria Liou et al.
3 links
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Flourishing-centered AI: designing AI for the multiple goods and tensions of living well

Ashton Anderson, Louis Tay, Harsh Kumar, Gloria Liou, Karina Vold, Daniel Harris
article en

Abstract

The rapid adoption of AI creates both opportunities and risks for human well-being and flourishing, underscoring the need for an integrative interdisciplinary framework to guide its design and evaluation. We advance a flourishing-centered AI framework that draws together philosophical, behavioral, interactional, and technical perspectives. We conceptualize human flourishing as multidimensional, encompassing subjective well-being, psychological functioning, character virtues, and psychological richness. This broader conception of flourishing extends existing approaches by explicitly incorporating character and other goods, and by confronting the possibility that these goods cannot always be maximized simultaneously. Two cross-cutting tensions arise: a temporal tension concerning immediate versus longer-term benefits, and a self-community tension concerning individual versus collective outcomes. We show how these tensions can be translated from behavioral objectives and measurable outcomes into interactional strategies and technical design choices. We conclude with implications for researchers and developers designing AI systems and for policymakers governing their use.

The Journal of Positive Psychology
University of Toronto (CA), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon