A Reference-Free Nanoindentation Model Based on Elastic Unloading Work for Texture-Resolved Residual Stress Evaluation in a Cu–Fe–P Alloy

Existing nanoindentation methods for residual-stress evaluation often require a stress-free reference and inadequately account for constitutive differences. This study proposes a reference-free model based on elastic unloading work. A two-dimensional axisymmetric finite-element model generated 270 cases over E/σy = 50–500, n = 0.1–0.3, and σr/σy = −0.8–0.8 to calibrate the correction factor, k, and stress-free recovery ratio, λ0. Comparison with 10 datasets from eight published studies yielded a mean absolute error of 15.8 MPa, a root mean square error of 24.93 MPa, and a mean absolute percentage error of 7.70%; eight datasets had relative errors below 20%. The model was combined with Electron Back-Scatter Diffraction (EBSD)-guided nanoindentation to evaluate the residual stress in the Cube, S, Brass, and Copper texture components of hot-rolled, cold-rolled, and annealed Cu–Fe–P alloys. In the cold-rolled sample, the Copper component showed a compressive residual stress of −162.23 MPa, compared with −98.43 MPa for S and −102.07 MPa for Brass, and remained highly compressive after annealing (−141.20 MPa). Kernel Average Misorientation (KAM), approximate Geometrically Necessary Dislocations (GND) density, and the Schmid factor showed trends broadly consistent with the texture-dependent residual stresses. The model provides a framework for residual-stress estimation in EBSD-identified texture regions without a physical stress-free reference using an effective isotropic approximation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metals
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/met16101152
Primary Topic
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reference-Free Nanoindentation Model Based on Elastic Unloading Work for Texture-Resolved Residual Stress Evaluation in a Cu–Fe–P Alloy

Yongbo Chai, Zheng Zhang, Junwei Qiao, Bowen Yu et al.
Metals
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
article

A Reference-Free Nanoindentation Model Based on Elastic Unloading Work for Texture-Resolved Residual Stress Evaluation in a Cu–Fe–P Alloy

Yongbo Chai, Zheng Zhang, Junwei Qiao, Bowen Yu, Min Zhang, Yuhui Guo
article en

Abstract

Existing nanoindentation methods for residual-stress evaluation often require a stress-free reference and inadequately account for constitutive differences. This study proposes a reference-free model based on elastic unloading work. A two-dimensional axisymmetric finite-element model generated 270 cases over E/σy = 50–500, n = 0.1–0.3, and σr/σy = −0.8–0.8 to calibrate the correction factor, k, and stress-free recovery ratio, λ0. Comparison with 10 datasets from eight published studies yielded a mean absolute error of 15.8 MPa, a root mean square error of 24.93 MPa, and a mean absolute percentage error of 7.70%; eight datasets had relative errors below 20%. The model was combined with Electron Back-Scatter Diffraction (EBSD)-guided nanoindentation to evaluate the residual stress in the Cube, S, Brass, and Copper texture components of hot-rolled, cold-rolled, and annealed Cu–Fe–P alloys. In the cold-rolled sample, the Copper component showed a compressive residual stress of −162.23 MPa, compared with −98.43 MPa for S and −102.07 MPa for Brass, and remained highly compressive after annealing (−141.20 MPa). Kernel Average Misorientation (KAM), approximate Geometrically Necessary Dislocations (GND) density, and the Schmid factor showed trends broadly consistent with the texture-dependent residual stresses. The model provides a framework for residual-stress estimation in EBSD-identified texture regions without a physical stress-free reference using an effective isotropic approximation.

MetalsVol. 16(10)
Taiyuan University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.