Impact of Acetate, Formate, and Lactate Background Electrolytes on Nitrate and Nitrite Separation by Capillary Electrophoresis

This study comparatively evaluated acetate, formate and lactate background electrolytes (30 mM, pH 4.0) for the determination of nitrate and nitrite by capillary electrophoresis. Standard solutions (5, 25 and 50 µg mL-1) were used to investigate the effects of electrolytes on migration time, theoretical plate number, peak symmetry and resolution. Acetate generated the highest electroosmotic flow mobility but resulted in the longest migration, the lowest theoretical plate numbers and pronounced peak fronting. Formate exhibited the highest separation efficiency and better peak symmetry, while lactate produced the shortest migration times at 25 and 50 µg mL-1. Based on these findings, formate and lactate were selected for calibration and accuracy experiments. Both electrolytes demonstrated good linearity (R²=0.9994 and =0.9999) over the concentration range of 6.25-100 µg mL-1. Lactate provided lower limits of detection, especially for nitrite. Formate revealed a better analytical accuracy, with recoveries of nitrate and nitrite (95.6% and 98.6%, respectively), compared to lactate (79.4% and 72.5%). In conclusion, the most suitable electrolyte is formate for capillary electrophoretic determination of nitrate and nitrite in processed meat products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chemistry and Technology
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1991964
Primary Topic
Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Acetate, Formate, and Lactate Background Electrolytes on Nitrate and Nitrite Separation by Capillary Electrophoresis

Ahmet Dursun, Pelin Koçak
International Journal of Chemistry and Technology
Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
article

Impact of Acetate, Formate, and Lactate Background Electrolytes on Nitrate and Nitrite Separation by Capillary Electrophoresis

Ahmet Dursun, Pelin Koçak
article en

Abstract

This study comparatively evaluated acetate, formate and lactate background electrolytes (30 mM, pH 4.0) for the determination of nitrate and nitrite by capillary electrophoresis. Standard solutions (5, 25 and 50 µg mL-1) were used to investigate the effects of electrolytes on migration time, theoretical plate number, peak symmetry and resolution. Acetate generated the highest electroosmotic flow mobility but resulted in the longest migration, the lowest theoretical plate numbers and pronounced peak fronting. Formate exhibited the highest separation efficiency and better peak symmetry, while lactate produced the shortest migration times at 25 and 50 µg mL-1. Based on these findings, formate and lactate were selected for calibration and accuracy experiments. Both electrolytes demonstrated good linearity (R²=0.9994 and =0.9999) over the concentration range of 6.25-100 µg mL-1. Lactate provided lower limits of detection, especially for nitrite. Formate revealed a better analytical accuracy, with recoveries of nitrate and nitrite (95.6% and 98.6%, respectively), compared to lactate (79.4% and 72.5%). In conclusion, the most suitable electrolyte is formate for capillary electrophoretic determination of nitrate and nitrite in processed meat products.

International Journal of Chemistry and Technology(11)
Mustafa Kemal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.