From Laboratory Waste to Building Strength: Evaluating Borosilicate Glass Powder as a Cement Replacement

Abstract The cement industry’s contribution of approximately 8% to global carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) emissions, coupled with significant laboratory glass waste disposal challenges, necessitates sustainable solutions addressing both environmental concerns. Despite extensive research on supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), limited investigation exists on borosilicate glass powder (BSGP) as cement replacement, representing a critical research gap in sustainable construction materials. This study aims to investigate BSGP as a sustainable cement replacement in mortar systems, evaluating its effects on mechanical properties, durability performance, and environmental sustainability. BSGP was incorporated at 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% cement replacement levels with comprehensive 120-day evaluation encompassing mechanical property testing, durability assessments (electrical resistivity, water absorption, acid resistance), microstructural analysis, predictive modeling, and life cycle assessment (LCA). The 15% BSGP replacement achieved optimal performance with 8.91% higher compressive strength (63.56 MPa) and 7.71% improved splitting tensile strength compared to control specimens. Durability enhancements included 91.37% increased electrical resistivity, 16.92% reduced water absorption, and superior acid resistance with 10% less strength degradation. The predictive model demonstrated 91% accuracy ( R 2 = 0.925 ), whereas life cycle assessment revealed linear reductions of 32.9 MJ / m 3 embodied energy (EE) and 6.43 kg CO 2 - eq / m 3 global warming potential (GWP) per 1% replacement. BSGP at 15%–20% replacement effectively enhances mechanical performance and durability while reducing environmental impacts; however, performance declines at 25% due to excessive cement dilution, confirming dosage-dependent effectiveness and alignment with circular economy principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-23641
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Laboratory Waste to Building Strength: Evaluating Borosilicate Glass Powder as a Cement Replacement

Salim Barbhuiya, Varisha, Khandaker M. Anwar Hossain, Mohd Moonis Zaheer et al.
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

From Laboratory Waste to Building Strength: Evaluating Borosilicate Glass Powder as a Cement Replacement

Salim Barbhuiya, Varisha, Khandaker M. Anwar Hossain, Mohd Moonis Zaheer, Mohammad Tabish, Faiz, Mohammad Salman, Adnan
article en

Abstract

Abstract The cement industry’s contribution of approximately 8% to global carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) emissions, coupled with significant laboratory glass waste disposal challenges, necessitates sustainable solutions addressing both environmental concerns. Despite extensive research on supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), limited investigation exists on borosilicate glass powder (BSGP) as cement replacement, representing a critical research gap in sustainable construction materials. This study aims to investigate BSGP as a sustainable cement replacement in mortar systems, evaluating its effects on mechanical properties, durability performance, and environmental sustainability. BSGP was incorporated at 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% cement replacement levels with comprehensive 120-day evaluation encompassing mechanical property testing, durability assessments (electrical resistivity, water absorption, acid resistance), microstructural analysis, predictive modeling, and life cycle assessment (LCA). The 15% BSGP replacement achieved optimal performance with 8.91% higher compressive strength (63.56 MPa) and 7.71% improved splitting tensile strength compared to control specimens. Durability enhancements included 91.37% increased electrical resistivity, 16.92% reduced water absorption, and superior acid resistance with 10% less strength degradation. The predictive model demonstrated 91% accuracy ( R 2 = 0.925 ), whereas life cycle assessment revealed linear reductions of 32.9 MJ / m 3 embodied energy (EE) and 6.43 kg CO 2 - eq / m 3 global warming potential (GWP) per 1% replacement. BSGP at 15%–20% replacement effectively enhances mechanical performance and durability while reducing environmental impacts; however, performance declines at 25% due to excessive cement dilution, confirming dosage-dependent effectiveness and alignment with circular economy principles.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 39(2)
University of East London (GB), Aligarh Muslim University (IN), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.