Global Prevalence and Epidemiological Drivers of Fasciola Infection in Buffaloes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fasciolosis, caused by Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica, negatively impacts buffalo production systems worldwide as a parasitic and zoonotic disease. Due to their semi-aquatic foraging behavior, buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) are highly exposed to Fasciola infections. The reported prevalence rates vary widely, hindering effective control strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the global pooled prevalence of Fasciola infection in buffaloes and explored major sources of heterogeneity. Following PRISMA guidelines, major databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CAB Abstracts, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception through September 2026. The primary synthesis used a random-effects binomial generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a logit link. Heterogeneity was quantified using Cochran’s Q, I2, and τ2; subgroup analyses and univariate meta-regression were used to explore study-level sources of variation, and Egger’s regression was used to assess funnel-plot asymmetry when at least 10 estimates were available. The final quantitative dataset comprised 64 publications contributing 73 effect estimates and 2,267,945 buffaloes after the removal of one exact duplicate estimate. The global pooled prevalence in buffaloes was 16.5% (95% CI: 12.1–22.0%), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.8%; τ2 = 2.366 on the logit scale). The pooled prevalence was 45.7% in Europe, 19.5% in Asia, 4.2% in Africa, and 7.9% in the Americas. By parasite identification, the prevalence was 28.4% for F. gigantica, 16.6% for F. hepatica, and 13.0% for Fasciola spp.; by diagnostic method, it was 20.8% for fecal examination, 10.5% for post-mortem examination, and 11.7% for ELISA. Continent was a significant categorical moderator (Qm = 16.48, p < 0.001; R2 = 19.3%), whereas study period, diagnostic method, Fasciola identification, categorical sample size, and climatic zone were not. When the sample size was modeled continuously as ln(n), it was inversely associated with prevalence (Qm = 11.42, p < 0.001; R2 = 15.8%). Fasciola infections remain an important and highly heterogeneous problem in buffalo populations. The wide variation among settings, together with evidence of continent- and sample size-related effects, supports region-specific surveillance, standardized diagnostics, molecular species identification, and integrated One Health control rather than reliance on a single global prevalence estimate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parasitologia
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/parasitologia6050061
Primary Topic
Helminth infection and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Prevalence and Epidemiological Drivers of Fasciola Infection in Buffaloes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abel Villa-Mancera
Parasitologia
Helminth infection and control
article

Global Prevalence and Epidemiological Drivers of Fasciola Infection in Buffaloes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abel Villa-Mancera
article en

Abstract

Fasciolosis, caused by Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica, negatively impacts buffalo production systems worldwide as a parasitic and zoonotic disease. Due to their semi-aquatic foraging behavior, buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) are highly exposed to Fasciola infections. The reported prevalence rates vary widely, hindering effective control strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the global pooled prevalence of Fasciola infection in buffaloes and explored major sources of heterogeneity. Following PRISMA guidelines, major databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CAB Abstracts, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception through September 2026. The primary synthesis used a random-effects binomial generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a logit link. Heterogeneity was quantified using Cochran’s Q, I2, and τ2; subgroup analyses and univariate meta-regression were used to explore study-level sources of variation, and Egger’s regression was used to assess funnel-plot asymmetry when at least 10 estimates were available. The final quantitative dataset comprised 64 publications contributing 73 effect estimates and 2,267,945 buffaloes after the removal of one exact duplicate estimate. The global pooled prevalence in buffaloes was 16.5% (95% CI: 12.1–22.0%), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.8%; τ2 = 2.366 on the logit scale). The pooled prevalence was 45.7% in Europe, 19.5% in Asia, 4.2% in Africa, and 7.9% in the Americas. By parasite identification, the prevalence was 28.4% for F. gigantica, 16.6% for F. hepatica, and 13.0% for Fasciola spp.; by diagnostic method, it was 20.8% for fecal examination, 10.5% for post-mortem examination, and 11.7% for ELISA. Continent was a significant categorical moderator (Qm = 16.48, p < 0.001; R2 = 19.3%), whereas study period, diagnostic method, Fasciola identification, categorical sample size, and climatic zone were not. When the sample size was modeled continuously as ln(n), it was inversely associated with prevalence (Qm = 11.42, p < 0.001; R2 = 15.8%). Fasciola infections remain an important and highly heterogeneous problem in buffalo populations. The wide variation among settings, together with evidence of continent- and sample size-related effects, supports region-specific surveillance, standardized diagnostics, molecular species identification, and integrated One Health control rather than reliance on a single global prevalence estimate.

ParasitologiaVol. 6(5)
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Helminth infection and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.