Inclusivity, equity, and empowerment in ‘citizen science’ research: persistent issues for science, policy, and participation

Abstract ‘Citizen science,’ an umbrella term for researchers and public participants collaborating to produce scientific knowledge, has both produced data informing public policies and been included in policies guiding future scientific inquiries. Yet, its use and influence remain challenging. Research has found incorporating inclusivity, equity, and/or empowerment principles into citizen science can bolster its value to science and society. This scoping review of 127 citizen science publications, identified via the Web of Science and other sources, explores how these publications describe the application of these principles in citizen science, and their linkages to data quality and ethics. The results describe linkages between these three principles, data quality, ethics, and the achievement of citizen science aims. Incorporating these principles requires significant design choices, influencing the distribution of costs, risks, and responsibilities. The findings also highlight multiple gaps in knowledge and related policies regarding applying these principles in citizen science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scag083
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusivity, equity, and empowerment in ‘citizen science’ research: persistent issues for science, policy, and participation

Tina‐Simone Neset, Karin Eliasson, Patricia Farrell Donahue
Science and Public Policy
Research Data Management Practices
article

Inclusivity, equity, and empowerment in ‘citizen science’ research: persistent issues for science, policy, and participation

Tina‐Simone Neset, Karin Eliasson, Patricia Farrell Donahue
article en

Abstract

Abstract ‘Citizen science,’ an umbrella term for researchers and public participants collaborating to produce scientific knowledge, has both produced data informing public policies and been included in policies guiding future scientific inquiries. Yet, its use and influence remain challenging. Research has found incorporating inclusivity, equity, and/or empowerment principles into citizen science can bolster its value to science and society. This scoping review of 127 citizen science publications, identified via the Web of Science and other sources, explores how these publications describe the application of these principles in citizen science, and their linkages to data quality and ethics. The results describe linkages between these three principles, data quality, ethics, and the achievement of citizen science aims. Incorporating these principles requires significant design choices, influencing the distribution of costs, risks, and responsibilities. The findings also highlight multiple gaps in knowledge and related policies regarding applying these principles in citizen science.

Science and Public Policy
Linköping University (SE), Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.