A Reassessment of the So-Called Horned Camel Images in Mongolian Rock Art

Abstract This article reassesses 17 animal images in Mongolian rock art that have previously been described as “horned camels.” The examples, recorded in Arkhangai, Bayan-Ölgii, Bayankhongor, Govi-Altai, Khovd, and Uvs provinces, were examined using a structured comparative protocol based on horn morphology, dorsal protrusions, body proportions, neck, limbs, tail, and compositional context. The images do not form a uniform type: They include deer-antlered, ibex-horned, and spike-horned figures, while the paired dorsal protrusions vary markedly in form and position. Three principal interpretations are supported. Some figures are more plausibly deer or ibex that were previously misidentified as camels; some dorsal protrusions may represent saddles, loads, or other attachments; and a limited number may be composite images combining horned-animal and camel-like traits. The Gants Mod figure in Tsengel district is the strongest composite case because deer-like head and antler features coexist with a deeply arched back and camel-like secondary traits. Accordingly, “horned camel” is best treated as an interpretive label rather than a fixed zoological or iconographic category.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Mongolian Diaspora Journal of Mongolian History and Culture
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/modi-2026-0025
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reassessment of the So-Called Horned Camel Images in Mongolian Rock Art

Ganbold Dovchindorj
Mongolian Diaspora Journal of Mongolian History and Culture
Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
article

A Reassessment of the So-Called Horned Camel Images in Mongolian Rock Art

Ganbold Dovchindorj
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article reassesses 17 animal images in Mongolian rock art that have previously been described as “horned camels.” The examples, recorded in Arkhangai, Bayan-Ölgii, Bayankhongor, Govi-Altai, Khovd, and Uvs provinces, were examined using a structured comparative protocol based on horn morphology, dorsal protrusions, body proportions, neck, limbs, tail, and compositional context. The images do not form a uniform type: They include deer-antlered, ibex-horned, and spike-horned figures, while the paired dorsal protrusions vary markedly in form and position. Three principal interpretations are supported. Some figures are more plausibly deer or ibex that were previously misidentified as camels; some dorsal protrusions may represent saddles, loads, or other attachments; and a limited number may be composite images combining horned-animal and camel-like traits. The Gants Mod figure in Tsengel district is the strongest composite case because deer-like head and antler features coexist with a deeply arched back and camel-like secondary traits. Accordingly, “horned camel” is best treated as an interpretive label rather than a fixed zoological or iconographic category.

Mongolian Diaspora Journal of Mongolian History and Culture
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.