Retrospective analysis of real-world elacestrant use in two large Austrian cancer centers

Background: Elacestrant is an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) approved for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) following progression on endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors. While randomized trial data from the EMERALD study demonstrated its clinical benefit, real-world evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC treated with elacestrant at two large cancer centers in Vienna, Austria. Clinical outcomes and safety were evaluated in routine clinical practice by experienced oncologists. Results: Elacestrant demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy in a heavily pretreated patient population of 30 patients with estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations. Median age was 65 years and the cohort was predominantly postmenopausal (86.7%). Before initiation of elacestrant, patients had received a median of two lines of endocrine therapy and one line of chemotherapy. Co-mutations of ESR1/PIK3CA were present in 33.3% of patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI 2.96 – 4.24) and median overall survival (OS) was 20.2 months (95% CI 5.04 – 35.36). Adverse events of any grade were found in 46.7% of patients. Within our cohort, a low rate of dose reductions (3.3%) was found. Subsequent therapies after elacestrant mainly consisted of antibody-drug conjugates (36.7% of patients) and chemotherapy (26.7%). Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, elacestrant showed effectiveness and tolerability similar to data observed in the EMERALD trial. Larger prospective real-world analyses are warranted to further validate these findings and define optimal patient selection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Care
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/brc/abrag003
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective analysis of real-world elacestrant use in two large Austrian cancer centers

Stefan Konrad, Christian Fridolin Singer, Zsuzsanna Bagó-Horváth, Simon Udovica et al.
Breast Care
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Retrospective analysis of real-world elacestrant use in two large Austrian cancer centers

Stefan Konrad, Christian Fridolin Singer, Zsuzsanna Bagó-Horváth, Simon Udovica, Kerstin Wimmer, Rupert Bartsch, Kathrin Strasser‐Weippl, Maximilian Marhold, Ruth Exner, Leonhard Muellauer, Constantin Mannsbart, Lisa Vesenmayer, Katharina Kantner
article en

Abstract

Background: Elacestrant is an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) approved for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) following progression on endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors. While randomized trial data from the EMERALD study demonstrated its clinical benefit, real-world evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC treated with elacestrant at two large cancer centers in Vienna, Austria. Clinical outcomes and safety were evaluated in routine clinical practice by experienced oncologists. Results: Elacestrant demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy in a heavily pretreated patient population of 30 patients with estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations. Median age was 65 years and the cohort was predominantly postmenopausal (86.7%). Before initiation of elacestrant, patients had received a median of two lines of endocrine therapy and one line of chemotherapy. Co-mutations of ESR1/PIK3CA were present in 33.3% of patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI 2.96 – 4.24) and median overall survival (OS) was 20.2 months (95% CI 5.04 – 35.36). Adverse events of any grade were found in 46.7% of patients. Within our cohort, a low rate of dose reductions (3.3%) was found. Subsequent therapies after elacestrant mainly consisted of antibody-drug conjugates (36.7% of patients) and chemotherapy (26.7%). Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, elacestrant showed effectiveness and tolerability similar to data observed in the EMERALD trial. Larger prospective real-world analyses are warranted to further validate these findings and define optimal patient selection.

Breast Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.