Marx’s concept of ecological freedom

In recent years, groundbreaking interpretations of Marx’s theory of freedom as ‘free disposable time’ and ‘socialist republicanism’ have emerged. While these contributions are significant, they remain incomplete for the Anthropocene because they neglect the sphere of nature. In order to update Marx’s theory of freedom, this article reconstructs four heuristic moments in Marx’s theory of freedom: early republican freedom as non-domination; the 1844 critique of alienated activity; the mature accounts of free time and rational metabolic regulation; and the late inquiry into agrarian communes. Drawing on the idea of relational freedom, it introduces ‘ecological freedom’ as an interpretive category grounded in human natural embeddedness. Its distinctive contribution is to connect that embeddedness to material access, democratic non-domination and the collective regulation of human-nature metabolism. Without idealising pre-capitalist peasant life, the article asks how contested capacities preserved in customary rights and communal practices might be reconstructed in a ‘higher form’. Their contemporary relevance lies in struggles for food sovereignty, agroecology and democratic control over land, technology and social metabolism. Ecological freedom thereby gives agrarian content to ecosocialist degrowth by making self-conscious limitation a condition of collective and sustainable freedom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2026.2742296
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marx’s concept of ecological freedom

Kohei Saito
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Marx’s concept of ecological freedom

Kohei Saito
article en

Abstract

In recent years, groundbreaking interpretations of Marx’s theory of freedom as ‘free disposable time’ and ‘socialist republicanism’ have emerged. While these contributions are significant, they remain incomplete for the Anthropocene because they neglect the sphere of nature. In order to update Marx’s theory of freedom, this article reconstructs four heuristic moments in Marx’s theory of freedom: early republican freedom as non-domination; the 1844 critique of alienated activity; the mature accounts of free time and rational metabolic regulation; and the late inquiry into agrarian communes. Drawing on the idea of relational freedom, it introduces ‘ecological freedom’ as an interpretive category grounded in human natural embeddedness. Its distinctive contribution is to connect that embeddedness to material access, democratic non-domination and the collective regulation of human-nature metabolism. Without idealising pre-capitalist peasant life, the article asks how contested capacities preserved in customary rights and communal practices might be reconstructed in a ‘higher form’. Their contemporary relevance lies in struggles for food sovereignty, agroecology and democratic control over land, technology and social metabolism. Ecological freedom thereby gives agrarian content to ecosocialist degrowth by making self-conscious limitation a condition of collective and sustainable freedom.

The Journal of Peasant Studies
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.