INTERVERTEBRAL DISC MECHANOBIOLOGY: INSIGHTS AND INCONSISTENCIES FROM WHOLE-ORGAN BIOREACTOR STUDIES

No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: EPSRC Doctoral Landscape Award Studentship. Background Poor intervertebral disc (IVD) health is a major contributor to low back pain and disability worldwide. Whole-organ bioreactors provide a platform to investigate IVD mechanobiology by replicating physiological loading, bridging the gap between cell culture models and animal studies, reducing animal use, and enabling cost-effective pre-clinical evaluation of interventions and regenerative strategies. Activities of daily living subject the IVD to complex loading in all six axes, but most whole-organ bioreactors are limited to applying simplified loading regimes in one or two axes. Furthermore, there is a lack of standardisation in bioreactor test protocols, resulting in substantial variability in applied load type, magnitude, duration, and IVD preparation and species. Methods This work aimed to evaluate previous IVD bioreactor studies to provide a better understanding of how loading influences cell viability and gene expression. Results Of the studies included, most reported no significant change in 15 commonly evaluated genes. When differences were identified, collagens I and II were more frequently downregulated in the annulus fibrosus, particularly under low-magnitude axial compression, whereas nucleus pulposus responses remained inconsistent across magnitudes and durations. A high variability in cell viability was observed across studies. Although lower loads often resulted in higher viability, the protocols typically employed shorter daily loading durations than higher-magnitude diurnal regimes, which limits direct comparisons. Conclusion This work highlights challenges in comparing IVD bioreactor studies and underscores limitations imposed by the absence of standardised practices. By identifying key trends and gaps, it supports the development of standardised loading protocols to strengthen mechanobiological insight and translational impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2026.10.010
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTERVERTEBRAL DISC MECHANOBIOLOGY: INSIGHTS AND INCONSISTENCIES FROM WHOLE-ORGAN BIOREACTOR STUDIES

Daisy Crouch, TP Holsgrove
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

INTERVERTEBRAL DISC MECHANOBIOLOGY: INSIGHTS AND INCONSISTENCIES FROM WHOLE-ORGAN BIOREACTOR STUDIES

Daisy Crouch, TP Holsgrove
article en

Abstract

No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: EPSRC Doctoral Landscape Award Studentship. Background Poor intervertebral disc (IVD) health is a major contributor to low back pain and disability worldwide. Whole-organ bioreactors provide a platform to investigate IVD mechanobiology by replicating physiological loading, bridging the gap between cell culture models and animal studies, reducing animal use, and enabling cost-effective pre-clinical evaluation of interventions and regenerative strategies. Activities of daily living subject the IVD to complex loading in all six axes, but most whole-organ bioreactors are limited to applying simplified loading regimes in one or two axes. Furthermore, there is a lack of standardisation in bioreactor test protocols, resulting in substantial variability in applied load type, magnitude, duration, and IVD preparation and species. Methods This work aimed to evaluate previous IVD bioreactor studies to provide a better understanding of how loading influences cell viability and gene expression. Results Of the studies included, most reported no significant change in 15 commonly evaluated genes. When differences were identified, collagens I and II were more frequently downregulated in the annulus fibrosus, particularly under low-magnitude axial compression, whereas nucleus pulposus responses remained inconsistent across magnitudes and durations. A high variability in cell viability was observed across studies. Although lower loads often resulted in higher viability, the protocols typically employed shorter daily loading durations than higher-magnitude diurnal regimes, which limits direct comparisons. Conclusion This work highlights challenges in comparing IVD bioreactor studies and underscores limitations imposed by the absence of standardised practices. By identifying key trends and gaps, it supports the development of standardised loading protocols to strengthen mechanobiological insight and translational impact.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 108-B(SUPP_10)
University of Exeter (GB), Devon & Exeter Institution (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.