Re-evaluating anubandha selection in the Śivasūtras: A functional–phonological justification

The fourteen Śivasūtra s of Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī organize the phonological inventory of Sanskrit through ordered phoneme sequences marked by thirteen mute consonants ( anubandhas : Ṇ, K, Ṅ, C, Ṭ, M, Ñ, Ṣ, Ś, V, Y, R, L ), enabling the formation of pratyāhāras —compressed representations of phonological classes that underlie the grammar’s derivational rules. While their structural economy has been noted in modern graph–theoretic and set–theoretic treatments, the principles governing the selection and exclusion of specific anubandha s remain insufficiently explained. This study proposes a functional-phonological account of the anubandha inventory by examining patterns of feature contrast, sonority hierarchy, articulatory ease, morphophonemic stability, and pratyāhāra economy. In most cases, the selected anubandha is typically phonetically distinct from the phoneme set it delimits through contrasts in manner, voicing, place of articulation, or a combination of these features. Sonorant anubandha s—particularly nasals and semivowels—are preferred in many environments because they permit smoother articulation and reduced boundary disruption, whereas stops and fricatives tend to occur in environments involving stronger phonetic demarcation. The study further examines the exclusion of aspirated stops, the glottal/ h /, and dentals, arguing that these omissions reflect concerns of phonological stability, recoverability, and structural economy within the grammatical system. Counterfactual substitutions demonstrate that alternative configurations often reduce the phonological coverage or increase descriptive complexity. By integrating evidence from grammatical usage, phonetic organization, and traditional commentary, the paper argues that the Śivasūtra anubandha s constitute a highly constrained and carefully stabilised metalinguistic system rather than an arbitrary mnemonic arrangement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Language Sciences
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2026.101885
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-evaluating anubandha selection in the Śivasūtras: A functional–phonological justification

Anita Nikhil Shroff
Language Sciences
Linguistics and language evolution
article

Re-evaluating anubandha selection in the Śivasūtras: A functional–phonological justification

Anita Nikhil Shroff
article en

Abstract

The fourteen Śivasūtra s of Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī organize the phonological inventory of Sanskrit through ordered phoneme sequences marked by thirteen mute consonants ( anubandhas : Ṇ, K, Ṅ, C, Ṭ, M, Ñ, Ṣ, Ś, V, Y, R, L ), enabling the formation of pratyāhāras —compressed representations of phonological classes that underlie the grammar’s derivational rules. While their structural economy has been noted in modern graph–theoretic and set–theoretic treatments, the principles governing the selection and exclusion of specific anubandha s remain insufficiently explained. This study proposes a functional-phonological account of the anubandha inventory by examining patterns of feature contrast, sonority hierarchy, articulatory ease, morphophonemic stability, and pratyāhāra economy. In most cases, the selected anubandha is typically phonetically distinct from the phoneme set it delimits through contrasts in manner, voicing, place of articulation, or a combination of these features. Sonorant anubandha s—particularly nasals and semivowels—are preferred in many environments because they permit smoother articulation and reduced boundary disruption, whereas stops and fricatives tend to occur in environments involving stronger phonetic demarcation. The study further examines the exclusion of aspirated stops, the glottal/ h /, and dentals, arguing that these omissions reflect concerns of phonological stability, recoverability, and structural economy within the grammatical system. Counterfactual substitutions demonstrate that alternative configurations often reduce the phonological coverage or increase descriptive complexity. By integrating evidence from grammatical usage, phonetic organization, and traditional commentary, the paper argues that the Śivasūtra anubandha s constitute a highly constrained and carefully stabilised metalinguistic system rather than an arbitrary mnemonic arrangement.

Language SciencesVol. 119
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.