Impact of Economic, Energy and Climate Policy Uncertainties on Multiple Energy Transition Pathways

ABSTRACT Achieving net‐zero and sustainable energy goals requires policy frameworks resilient to economic, energy and climate policy uncertainty. This study examines how these uncertainties, alongside globalisation, capital intensity and environmental regulatory stringency, shape three energy transition pathways across OECD countries (1991–2020): the shift from dirtier to less‐dirty non‐renewable sources (DLD), the shift from clean‐to‐cleaner renewable sources (CMC), and a comprehensive energy transition index (CET) combining both. Using the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) estimator to address endogeneity and estimate long‐run co‐integrating relationships, the study finds that climate policy uncertainty is associated with DLD but not with CMC and CET, suggesting it redirects rather than accelerates the transitions. World economic and energy‐related uncertainty exert pathway‐specific effects that vary across the three measures. Globalisation and environmental regulatory stringency emerge as robust, positive drivers of all three pathways. Capital intensity supports the CMC and CET pathways but not DLD, suggesting capital‐intensive investment accelerates renewable deployment more than it improves the non‐renewable energy mix. Economic growth shows a similarly divergent effect, reducing the DLD transition while promoting CMC and CET, reflecting its dual role in reinforcing fossil‐fuel infrastructure and financing cleaner alternatives. These findings carry differentiated policy implications: governments should prioritise reducing climate policy uncertainty through stable, long‐term regulatory commitments, sustain environmental regulatory stringency, and pair capital‐intensive investment with targeted incentives to improve the non‐renewable energy mix, since investment alone does not guarantee progress on every margin. The study offers OECD policymakers pathway‐specific guidance for differentiated, rather than one‐size‐fits‐all, energy and climate policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71733
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Economic, Energy and Climate Policy Uncertainties on Multiple Energy Transition Pathways

Shahzad Alvi
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Impact of Economic, Energy and Climate Policy Uncertainties on Multiple Energy Transition Pathways

Shahzad Alvi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Achieving net‐zero and sustainable energy goals requires policy frameworks resilient to economic, energy and climate policy uncertainty. This study examines how these uncertainties, alongside globalisation, capital intensity and environmental regulatory stringency, shape three energy transition pathways across OECD countries (1991–2020): the shift from dirtier to less‐dirty non‐renewable sources (DLD), the shift from clean‐to‐cleaner renewable sources (CMC), and a comprehensive energy transition index (CET) combining both. Using the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) estimator to address endogeneity and estimate long‐run co‐integrating relationships, the study finds that climate policy uncertainty is associated with DLD but not with CMC and CET, suggesting it redirects rather than accelerates the transitions. World economic and energy‐related uncertainty exert pathway‐specific effects that vary across the three measures. Globalisation and environmental regulatory stringency emerge as robust, positive drivers of all three pathways. Capital intensity supports the CMC and CET pathways but not DLD, suggesting capital‐intensive investment accelerates renewable deployment more than it improves the non‐renewable energy mix. Economic growth shows a similarly divergent effect, reducing the DLD transition while promoting CMC and CET, reflecting its dual role in reinforcing fossil‐fuel infrastructure and financing cleaner alternatives. These findings carry differentiated policy implications: governments should prioritise reducing climate policy uncertainty through stable, long‐term regulatory commitments, sustain environmental regulatory stringency, and pair capital‐intensive investment with targeted incentives to improve the non‐renewable energy mix, since investment alone does not guarantee progress on every margin. The study offers OECD policymakers pathway‐specific guidance for differentiated, rather than one‐size‐fits‐all, energy and climate policy.

Sustainable Development
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.