Professional ethical guidance for AI use (PEG-AI) in healthcare: a rapid scoping review

Abstract Healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the patients they treat would benefit from professional ethical guidance for the use of AI (PEG-AI) in healthcare. A proactive approach, asserting unified and standardised guidance covering all HCPs in the United Kingdom, would assert clear and authoritative standards for HCP practice to abide by. This rapid scoping review seeks to aid this goal by answering the question: What ethical principles, rules, or claims that can guide the use of AI in professional healthcare practice can be identified within the literature?. The literature search resulted in the inclusion of 124 items and generated 9 overarching themes comprising 33 distinct normative claims about the ethical use of AI in healthcare. This review captures current published thinking about principles to govern AI use in clinical settings across a wide range of peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, and formal guidance. This provides a baseline on which to build unified guidance across the healthcare professions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01443-2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professional ethical guidance for AI use (PEG-AI) in healthcare: a rapid scoping review

Jonathan Ives, Helen Smith
AI and Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Professional ethical guidance for AI use (PEG-AI) in healthcare: a rapid scoping review

Jonathan Ives, Helen Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract Healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the patients they treat would benefit from professional ethical guidance for the use of AI (PEG-AI) in healthcare. A proactive approach, asserting unified and standardised guidance covering all HCPs in the United Kingdom, would assert clear and authoritative standards for HCP practice to abide by. This rapid scoping review seeks to aid this goal by answering the question: What ethical principles, rules, or claims that can guide the use of AI in professional healthcare practice can be identified within the literature?. The literature search resulted in the inclusion of 124 items and generated 9 overarching themes comprising 33 distinct normative claims about the ethical use of AI in healthcare. This review captures current published thinking about principles to govern AI use in clinical settings across a wide range of peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, and formal guidance. This provides a baseline on which to build unified guidance across the healthcare professions.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(6)
University of Bristol (GB), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Professional ethical guidance for AI use (PEG-AI) in healthcare: a rapid scoping review — Jonathan Ives, Helen Smith · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS