Green Fiscal and Financial Policies on Land-Use Coordination in China: The Roles of Energy Structure and R&D Intensity

China’s energy transition is changing the spatial demand for extraction, generation, and infrastructure, but the role of public support instruments in coordinating land use remains unclear. We construct a green fiscal, tax, and financial support (GFTF) index and a land-use coordination measure. The panel contains annual observations for 30 provincial-level regions in mainland China over 2005–2023. The results show the following: (1) two-way fixed-effects estimates show that GFTF is positively associated with land-use coordination. This result is stable across alternative index weights, samples, model specifications, and an instrumental-variable estimate; (2) GFTF is related to a lower coal share of energy consumption, while a higher coal share is associated with weaker land-use coordination. These estimates support partial mediation through energy structure; (3) the GFTF-by-R&D term is positive, which indicates a stronger association where R&D investment is higher; (4) regional estimates are positive and significant in eastern, central, and western China, but not in northeastern China. Both resource-based and other provinces show positive estimates. The findings provide empirical support for considering policy designs that coordinate fiscal expenditure, resource taxation, and green finance while accounting for cleaner energy use and region-specific land constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19204935
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Fiscal and Financial Policies on Land-Use Coordination in China: The Roles of Energy Structure and R&D Intensity

Lei Zhuang, Siqian Wang
Energies
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Green Fiscal and Financial Policies on Land-Use Coordination in China: The Roles of Energy Structure and R&D Intensity

Lei Zhuang, Siqian Wang
article en

Abstract

China’s energy transition is changing the spatial demand for extraction, generation, and infrastructure, but the role of public support instruments in coordinating land use remains unclear. We construct a green fiscal, tax, and financial support (GFTF) index and a land-use coordination measure. The panel contains annual observations for 30 provincial-level regions in mainland China over 2005–2023. The results show the following: (1) two-way fixed-effects estimates show that GFTF is positively associated with land-use coordination. This result is stable across alternative index weights, samples, model specifications, and an instrumental-variable estimate; (2) GFTF is related to a lower coal share of energy consumption, while a higher coal share is associated with weaker land-use coordination. These estimates support partial mediation through energy structure; (3) the GFTF-by-R&D term is positive, which indicates a stronger association where R&D investment is higher; (4) regional estimates are positive and significant in eastern, central, and western China, but not in northeastern China. Both resource-based and other provinces show positive estimates. The findings provide empirical support for considering policy designs that coordinate fiscal expenditure, resource taxation, and green finance while accounting for cleaner energy use and region-specific land constraints.

EnergiesVol. 19(20)
Nanjing Tech University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.