Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams: A Review of Flexural, Shear, and Impact-Related Techniques, Performance, and Failure Mechanisms

Due to the high tensile strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and relative ease of installation, Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composites are commonly utilized to strengthen deficient reinforced concrete (RC) beams. Therefore, several CFRP techniques for flexural and shear strengthening such as externally bonded reinforcement, near-surface-mounted systems, embedded and through-section reinforcement, prestressed systems, and side-, U-, and O-jacketing configurations, were compared in this review. The study investigates how the CFRP technique performance is impacted by CFRP properties and layout, bonded area, number of layers, fiber orientation, anchorage details, substrate condition, and installation quality rather than treating these techniques as interchangeable. According to the results, CFRP strengthening commonly increased load-carrying capacity and stiffness while improving crack control. However, these advantages and improvements fluctuate significantly, and strength enhancement does not guarantee higher ductility. Underperformance is mostly caused by major constraints, including early debonding, CFRP rupture, adhesive deterioration, inadequate anchorage, and site-related construction constraints. Moreover, while the externally bonded systems remain the most accessible and widely used option, near-surface-mounted and embedded techniques offer superior protection for reinforcement and demonstrate higher resistance to debonding. The results indicate that enclosed wrapping typically provides the greatest structural benefit regarding shear strengthening, although spatial constraints around existing beams often make U-wrapping the more viable alternative. However, long-term durability, high-temperature and fire resilience, standardized anchorage design, full-scale field validation, hybrid strengthening approaches, and practical design models are considered substantial knowledge gaps. As a result, this review offers a robust framework for optimal design of CFRP strengthening systems for RC beams based on establishing a correlation between installation choices and both structural behavior and failure modes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11100378
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams: A Review of Flexural, Shear, and Impact-Related Techniques, Performance, and Failure Mechanisms

Fadi Alhomaidat, Mousa Abushattal, Haneen Altawaiha
Infrastructures
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams: A Review of Flexural, Shear, and Impact-Related Techniques, Performance, and Failure Mechanisms

Fadi Alhomaidat, Mousa Abushattal, Haneen Altawaiha
article en

Abstract

Due to the high tensile strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and relative ease of installation, Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composites are commonly utilized to strengthen deficient reinforced concrete (RC) beams. Therefore, several CFRP techniques for flexural and shear strengthening such as externally bonded reinforcement, near-surface-mounted systems, embedded and through-section reinforcement, prestressed systems, and side-, U-, and O-jacketing configurations, were compared in this review. The study investigates how the CFRP technique performance is impacted by CFRP properties and layout, bonded area, number of layers, fiber orientation, anchorage details, substrate condition, and installation quality rather than treating these techniques as interchangeable. According to the results, CFRP strengthening commonly increased load-carrying capacity and stiffness while improving crack control. However, these advantages and improvements fluctuate significantly, and strength enhancement does not guarantee higher ductility. Underperformance is mostly caused by major constraints, including early debonding, CFRP rupture, adhesive deterioration, inadequate anchorage, and site-related construction constraints. Moreover, while the externally bonded systems remain the most accessible and widely used option, near-surface-mounted and embedded techniques offer superior protection for reinforcement and demonstrate higher resistance to debonding. The results indicate that enclosed wrapping typically provides the greatest structural benefit regarding shear strengthening, although spatial constraints around existing beams often make U-wrapping the more viable alternative. However, long-term durability, high-temperature and fire resilience, standardized anchorage design, full-scale field validation, hybrid strengthening approaches, and practical design models are considered substantial knowledge gaps. As a result, this review offers a robust framework for optimal design of CFRP strengthening systems for RC beams based on establishing a correlation between installation choices and both structural behavior and failure modes.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(10)
Al-Hussein Bin Talal University (JO), Al-Balqa Applied University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.