What Does a Donor Need to Know? Content Analysis of Informed Consent Documents Used for Brain Organoid Research

Donors of cells used to create induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and brain organoids may not understand what brain organoids are, how they will be used, or the long-term implications of the research. Informed consent documents (ICDs) often contain highly technical language and are written at reading grade levels higher than those attained by the target population. Our goal was to evaluate informed consent documents used for brain organoid research. We compared 20 currently active, IRB-approved consent documents to published templates/guidelines for iPSC research consent. Analyzed ICDs adhered to guidelines in explaining risks and benefits, de-identification, commercial potential, storage, and results sharing. However, descriptions of current and future use were lacking in detail, and the average reading level of ICDs far exceeded that of the general population. Our findings suggest additional transparency in ICDs would assist participants in making an informed choice about participation in iPSC and brain organoid research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJOB Neuroscience
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2026.2736005
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Does a Donor Need to Know? Content Analysis of Informed Consent Documents Used for Brain Organoid Research

Betty Cohn, Katherine E. MacDuffie, Zoe Jane Hale, A. Beretta
AJOB Neuroscience
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

What Does a Donor Need to Know? Content Analysis of Informed Consent Documents Used for Brain Organoid Research

Betty Cohn, Katherine E. MacDuffie, Zoe Jane Hale, A. Beretta
article en

Abstract

Donors of cells used to create induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and brain organoids may not understand what brain organoids are, how they will be used, or the long-term implications of the research. Informed consent documents (ICDs) often contain highly technical language and are written at reading grade levels higher than those attained by the target population. Our goal was to evaluate informed consent documents used for brain organoid research. We compared 20 currently active, IRB-approved consent documents to published templates/guidelines for iPSC research consent. Analyzed ICDs adhered to guidelines in explaining risks and benefits, de-identification, commercial potential, storage, and results sharing. However, descriptions of current and future use were lacking in detail, and the average reading level of ICDs far exceeded that of the general population. Our findings suggest additional transparency in ICDs would assist participants in making an informed choice about participation in iPSC and brain organoid research.

AJOB Neuroscience
University of Washington (US), Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.