Citizens' perceptions of accountability in AI-based public sector decision making

Research has increasingly focused on identifying and analyzing the key components of accountability in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector. However, much of the existing literature takes a government-centric approach, emphasizing how public organizations implement accountability measures while paying limited attention to citizens' perspectives. This study addresses this gap by empirically examining whom citizens believe should be held accountable and what information about AI-based decisions should be communicated to the public. Using data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. citizens, our analysis reveals several overall trends in public perceptions of accountability for AI-based systems, as well as demographic differences. These findings provide valuable empirical insights to advance research and practice on the use of AI in government.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Government Information Quarterly
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2026.102189
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizens' perceptions of accountability in AI-based public sector decision making

Tzuhao Chen, J. Ramón Gil-García, Mila Gascó‐Hernández
Government Information Quarterly
E-Government and Public Services
article

Citizens' perceptions of accountability in AI-based public sector decision making

Tzuhao Chen, J. Ramón Gil-García, Mila Gascó‐Hernández
article en

Abstract

Research has increasingly focused on identifying and analyzing the key components of accountability in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector. However, much of the existing literature takes a government-centric approach, emphasizing how public organizations implement accountability measures while paying limited attention to citizens' perspectives. This study addresses this gap by empirically examining whom citizens believe should be held accountable and what information about AI-based decisions should be communicated to the public. Using data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. citizens, our analysis reveals several overall trends in public perceptions of accountability for AI-based systems, as well as demographic differences. These findings provide valuable empirical insights to advance research and practice on the use of AI in government.

Government Information QuarterlyVol. 43(4)
Florida International University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Universidad de las Américas Puebla (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.