AI as intern, not oracle: a design logic for human–AI partnership in experiential entrepreneurship education

Abstract Entrepreneurship education (EE) is increasingly extending across disciplines and institutional contexts, creating pressure to sustain the facilitation, reflection and contextual responsiveness required by experiential learning. At the same time, the rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education raises questions about how AI can support such experiential learning without assuming authority over the judgement and decision-making central to entrepreneurial action. This study develops and empirically examines an AI-as-intern design logic for experiential EE. Rather than positioning AI as an authoritative “oracle”, the framework establishes an intentionally asymmetric human-AI partnership. Here AI provides prompts, alternatives, provisional representations and process support, while learners and educators retain responsibility for contextual interpretation, evaluative judgement and consequential decisions. The study examines two postgraduate entrepreneurship cohorts at a UK university ( n = 60) using a custom AI-enabled platform integrated into normal teaching. Evidence comprised session recordings and transcripts, observational field notes, a post-workshop survey, and 12 semi-structured interviews. Findings show that students used AI primarily as process scaffolding and iterative support. Learners accepted, rejected, modified and combined AI-generated material, while team interaction created additional opportunities for scrutiny and contextual evaluation. Our findings do not establish improvements in students’ judgement, creativity or cognitive load, but do show how these activities remained active within a bounded human-AI arrangement. The paper contributes a pedagogic design logic for AI-enabled experiential EE and provides exploratory propositions for the design of human-AI pedagogy concerning human authority, evaluative judgement, collaborative oversight, creative sequencing and bounded scaffolding under conditions of scaling pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entrepreneurship Education
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-026-00196-7
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI as intern, not oracle: a design logic for human–AI partnership in experiential entrepreneurship education

Ali Ahmad, Maria Napitupulu, Dwitya Amry, Denis Oakley et al.
Entrepreneurship Education
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

AI as intern, not oracle: a design logic for human–AI partnership in experiential entrepreneurship education

Ali Ahmad, Maria Napitupulu, Dwitya Amry, Denis Oakley, James McInerny
article en

Abstract

Abstract Entrepreneurship education (EE) is increasingly extending across disciplines and institutional contexts, creating pressure to sustain the facilitation, reflection and contextual responsiveness required by experiential learning. At the same time, the rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education raises questions about how AI can support such experiential learning without assuming authority over the judgement and decision-making central to entrepreneurial action. This study develops and empirically examines an AI-as-intern design logic for experiential EE. Rather than positioning AI as an authoritative “oracle”, the framework establishes an intentionally asymmetric human-AI partnership. Here AI provides prompts, alternatives, provisional representations and process support, while learners and educators retain responsibility for contextual interpretation, evaluative judgement and consequential decisions. The study examines two postgraduate entrepreneurship cohorts at a UK university ( n = 60) using a custom AI-enabled platform integrated into normal teaching. Evidence comprised session recordings and transcripts, observational field notes, a post-workshop survey, and 12 semi-structured interviews. Findings show that students used AI primarily as process scaffolding and iterative support. Learners accepted, rejected, modified and combined AI-generated material, while team interaction created additional opportunities for scrutiny and contextual evaluation. Our findings do not establish improvements in students’ judgement, creativity or cognitive load, but do show how these activities remained active within a bounded human-AI arrangement. The paper contributes a pedagogic design logic for AI-enabled experiential EE and provides exploratory propositions for the design of human-AI pedagogy concerning human authority, evaluative judgement, collaborative oversight, creative sequencing and bounded scaffolding under conditions of scaling pressure.

Entrepreneurship Education
Innovate UK (GB), University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.