A Buddhist Psychological Analysis Framework for Evaluating Anthropological, Genetic, and Cosmological Data: Bypassing Investigator Bias and Dogmatic Interpretations

Modern anthropological, genetic, and cosmological models often carry implicit cognitive frameworks shaped by colonial-era paradigms, institutional biases, and dogmatic paradigm preservation. This paper presents an investigative research methodology based strictly on early Theravada epistemological and psychological principles derived from canonical sources (Kalama Sutta, Vimansaka Sutta, Canki Sutta, and Upali Sutta). Rather than force-fitting religious concepts into scientific data, this framework functions as a critical epistemological filter to distinguish empirical physical evidence (Rupa) from researcher-imposed conceptual constructs (Nama). Applying this framework to prehistoric archaeological findings and genetic continuity models in Sri Lanka reveals significant investigator biases and cognitive dissonance within mainstream academic literature. Furthermore, by evaluating the current scientific limitations of chemical abiogenesis (DNA/RNA spontaneous generation), the paper examines the Agganna Sutta's account of an energy/consciousness-based origin of life—which parallels concepts in quantum physics—as an unrefuted, scientifically legitimate hypothesis open for empirical inquiry

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23486319
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Buddhist Psychological Analysis Framework for Evaluating Anthropological, Genetic, and Cosmological Data: Bypassing Investigator Bias and Dogmatic Interpretations

SARATH KUMARA MAHANTHIMULLA GAMAGE
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

A Buddhist Psychological Analysis Framework for Evaluating Anthropological, Genetic, and Cosmological Data: Bypassing Investigator Bias and Dogmatic Interpretations

SARATH KUMARA MAHANTHIMULLA GAMAGE
article en

Abstract

Modern anthropological, genetic, and cosmological models often carry implicit cognitive frameworks shaped by colonial-era paradigms, institutional biases, and dogmatic paradigm preservation. This paper presents an investigative research methodology based strictly on early Theravada epistemological and psychological principles derived from canonical sources (Kalama Sutta, Vimansaka Sutta, Canki Sutta, and Upali Sutta). Rather than force-fitting religious concepts into scientific data, this framework functions as a critical epistemological filter to distinguish empirical physical evidence (Rupa) from researcher-imposed conceptual constructs (Nama). Applying this framework to prehistoric archaeological findings and genetic continuity models in Sri Lanka reveals significant investigator biases and cognitive dissonance within mainstream academic literature. Furthermore, by evaluating the current scientific limitations of chemical abiogenesis (DNA/RNA spontaneous generation), the paper examines the Agganna Sutta's account of an energy/consciousness-based origin of life—which parallels concepts in quantum physics—as an unrefuted, scientifically legitimate hypothesis open for empirical inquiry

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.