IMPLICATIONS OF FALSE PROPHECY IN KENYA THROUGH THE LENS OF EZEKIEL 13:1-7: EXEGETICAL AND CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATION

False Prophecy remains an important theological and ecclesial concern wherever individuals claim divine authority for messages that originate from human interest, subjective conviction, political ideology, economic ambition, or manipulative religious practices. In the Hebrew Bible, the problem of false prophecy is not restricted to failed predictions. This article examines the implications of false prophecy in Kenya through the lens of Ezekiel 13:1-7. It employs an exegetical and contextual methodology, based on published literature. The exegetical analysis examines the historical and literary setting of Ezekiel 13:1-7, the theological significance of self-inspired prophets, the metaphor of “foxes among ruins”, the failure to repair the breaches, the concept of empty visions and deceptive divinations, and the concluding claim, “thus Yahweh says”; yet, Yahweh has not spoken. These exegetical observations are brought into dialogue with scholarship on African Pentecostalism, Kenyan Pentecostal-charismatic Christianity, political prophecy, prosperity-oriented and crisis or health-related prophetic practices in Kenya. The study argues that Ezekiel 13:1-7 should not be used to dismiss prophecy or Pentecostal Christianity generally. Reasonably, it provides a theological framework for distinguishing prophetic ministry that serves the community from prophetic authority that exploits vulnerability. The article concludes that the recovery of accountable, scripture-grounded, ethically responsible, and community-protective prophetic ministry is essential for the credibility of Christianity in Kenya. Keywords: prophecy; false prophecy; political prophecy; prophetic accountability; prosperity prophecy; self-inspired prophets