Intermediaries: R. v Rodgers (Sean)

Comments on R. v Rodgers (Sean) (CA), an appeal against a conviction for murder on the ground that the trial was unfair following the loss of legal representation for a defendant with a learning disability, considering whether safeguards to mitigate vulnerability, including holding a ground rules hearing and using a registered intermediary, were properly and lawfully deployed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2026-11-01
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intermediaries: R. v Rodgers (Sean)

John; id_orcid 0000-0001-5824-1016 Taggart
2 links
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

Intermediaries: R. v Rodgers (Sean)

John; id_orcid 0000-0001-5824-1016 Taggart
article en

Abstract

Comments on R. v Rodgers (Sean) (CA), an appeal against a conviction for murder on the ground that the trial was unfair following the loss of legal representation for a defendant with a learning disability, considering whether safeguards to mitigate vulnerability, including holding a ground rules hearing and using a registered intermediary, were properly and lawfully deployed.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon