Exploring factors associated with parental adherence to prevention strategies for positional plagiocephaly or brachycephaly: multi-method study results

This multi-method study explored factors influencing parental adherence to prevention strategies for positional cranial asymmetry (CA), specifically plagiocephaly and brachycephaly. Parents of newborns (N = 218) completed a 39-question online survey using 7-point Likert-type items and responded to one open-ended question. Survey development was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capacity, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behavior (COM-B). The open-ended question (n = 112) aimed to capture the main barriers hindering parental adherence. Descriptive analysis of item ratings and deductive-inductive theming of open-ended responses were synthesized. Survey findings underscored factors related to six COM-B subdomains-psychological and physical capability, social and environmental opportunity, and automatic and reflective motivation-influenced parental adherence. Open-ended responses revealed six overarching themes: (1) comprehensive detailed information, (2) infant's limited tolerance for prone position, (3) parental-related adjustment factors, (4) time and household management, (5) access to reliable resources, and (6) social support. This study highlights key factors influencing parental adherence to CA prevention, including a need for clear information, social support, and practical strategies for busy households. Addressing these barriers may enhance adherence and improve prevention efforts and newborn outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Health Care
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935261499318
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring factors associated with parental adherence to prevention strategies for positional plagiocephaly or brachycephaly: multi-method study results

Chantal Camden, Karen Hurtubise, Isabelle Gaboury, Nathalie Trottier
Journal of Child Health Care
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Exploring factors associated with parental adherence to prevention strategies for positional plagiocephaly or brachycephaly: multi-method study results

Chantal Camden, Karen Hurtubise, Isabelle Gaboury, Nathalie Trottier
article en

Abstract

This multi-method study explored factors influencing parental adherence to prevention strategies for positional cranial asymmetry (CA), specifically plagiocephaly and brachycephaly. Parents of newborns (N = 218) completed a 39-question online survey using 7-point Likert-type items and responded to one open-ended question. Survey development was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capacity, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behavior (COM-B). The open-ended question (n = 112) aimed to capture the main barriers hindering parental adherence. Descriptive analysis of item ratings and deductive-inductive theming of open-ended responses were synthesized. Survey findings underscored factors related to six COM-B subdomains-psychological and physical capability, social and environmental opportunity, and automatic and reflective motivation-influenced parental adherence. Open-ended responses revealed six overarching themes: (1) comprehensive detailed information, (2) infant's limited tolerance for prone position, (3) parental-related adjustment factors, (4) time and household management, (5) access to reliable resources, and (6) social support. This study highlights key factors influencing parental adherence to CA prevention, including a need for clear information, social support, and practical strategies for busy households. Addressing these barriers may enhance adherence and improve prevention efforts and newborn outcomes.

Journal of Child Health Care
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.