Collective ambiguity attitude as response to individuals’ ones and belief disagreements

Abstract This paper axiomatically characterizes the rule of aggregating individuals’ ambiguous beliefs into the society’s ambiguous belief. We consider a family of social rankings over acts which are indexed by pairs of utility profiles and ambiguous belief profiles, and impose variable-profile axioms which express how society should respond to changes in belief profiles and changes in how beliefs disagree. Our characterization allows two kinds of collective ambiguity aversion, one arising due to individuals’ ambiguity aversion and the other arising due to disagreements in beliefs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Theory
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-026-01756-7
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective ambiguity attitude as response to individuals’ ones and belief disagreements

Takashi Hayashi
Economic Theory
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Collective ambiguity attitude as response to individuals’ ones and belief disagreements

Takashi Hayashi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper axiomatically characterizes the rule of aggregating individuals’ ambiguous beliefs into the society’s ambiguous belief. We consider a family of social rankings over acts which are indexed by pairs of utility profiles and ambiguous belief profiles, and impose variable-profile axioms which express how society should respond to changes in belief profiles and changes in how beliefs disagree. Our characterization allows two kinds of collective ambiguity aversion, one arising due to individuals’ ambiguity aversion and the other arising due to disagreements in beliefs.

Economic Theory
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.