Beyond GDP: Measuring U.S. and Chinese National Power, 1820–2076

Debates about the balance of power between the United States and China often turn on a single number, gross domestic product, and the answer depends on which GDP is used: at market exchange rates the U.S. economy is about 58 percent larger, while at purchasing-power parity China’s is about 34 percent larger. This paper argues that national power is better understood as a system of interdependent capabilities and measures it on that basis. It proposes an eight-element framework, covering economy, manufacturing, technology, energy, finance, military, alliances and human capital, with demography, infrastructure and fiscal space treated as cross-cutting conditions. Using 31 indicators drawn from primary sources for 2024–2026 and a transparent metric (China’s share of the combined U.S.–China value, where 0.5 marks parity), the paper finds that the two countries have strongly asymmetric profiles. China leads clearly in manufacturing (0.84) and energy (0.75); the United States leads strongly in finance (0.09), alliances (0.30) and military capability (0.32), more moderately in human capital (0.36) and the economy taken as a whole (0.36), and narrowly in technology (0.45). The equal-weight composite is 0.43, and across sixteen alternative specifications it stays between 0.38 and 0.48. China is never placed ahead of the United States, yet no element is close to a stable equilibrium. Long-run evidence from the Maddison Project and the Correlates of War capability index (1820–2022), together with United Nations, OECD and private projections to 2076, shows that the present balance is the product of a historic reversal and that its next phase will be shaped by demography and by the conversion of physical capacity into productivity rather than by aggregate size alone. Files: the paper (PDF); the indicator data for Table 2 and Appendix A (CSV, 31 indicators with values, shares, element scores, sources and notes); and a README describing the columns. Data current to 18 October 2026.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23457483
Primary Topic
COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond GDP: Measuring U.S. and Chinese National Power, 1820–2076

Md. Atique Ullah Siddique
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
article

Beyond GDP: Measuring U.S. and Chinese National Power, 1820–2076

Md. Atique Ullah Siddique
article en

Abstract

Debates about the balance of power between the United States and China often turn on a single number, gross domestic product, and the answer depends on which GDP is used: at market exchange rates the U.S. economy is about 58 percent larger, while at purchasing-power parity China’s is about 34 percent larger. This paper argues that national power is better understood as a system of interdependent capabilities and measures it on that basis. It proposes an eight-element framework, covering economy, manufacturing, technology, energy, finance, military, alliances and human capital, with demography, infrastructure and fiscal space treated as cross-cutting conditions. Using 31 indicators drawn from primary sources for 2024–2026 and a transparent metric (China’s share of the combined U.S.–China value, where 0.5 marks parity), the paper finds that the two countries have strongly asymmetric profiles. China leads clearly in manufacturing (0.84) and energy (0.75); the United States leads strongly in finance (0.09), alliances (0.30) and military capability (0.32), more moderately in human capital (0.36) and the economy taken as a whole (0.36), and narrowly in technology (0.45). The equal-weight composite is 0.43, and across sixteen alternative specifications it stays between 0.38 and 0.48. China is never placed ahead of the United States, yet no element is close to a stable equilibrium. Long-run evidence from the Maddison Project and the Correlates of War capability index (1820–2022), together with United Nations, OECD and private projections to 2076, shows that the present balance is the product of a historic reversal and that its next phase will be shaped by demography and by the conversion of physical capacity into productivity rather than by aggregate size alone. Files: the paper (PDF); the indicator data for Table 2 and Appendix A (CSV, 31 indicators with values, shares, element scores, sources and notes); and a README describing the columns. Data current to 18 October 2026.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.