Public Attitudes Towards Regenerative Orthopedic Therapy

Objective To assess awareness, self-rated knowledge, treatment perceptions, and perceived barriers concerning regenerative orthopedic therapies. Methods An anonymous, opt-in, cross-sectional online survey of 100 US adults was analyzed using unweighted descriptive statistics. Results Mean age was 63.5 years; 64% were female. Sixty percent reported prior awareness, while 77% rated their knowledge as little or none. Stem cell therapy was recognized by 84% and platelet-rich plasma by 30%. Physicians were the primary medical information source for 71%; 63% would consider physician-recommended treatment. Seventy-seven percent would pay nothing or less than $500 per session. Perceived barriers included cost (72%), lack of insurance coverage (62%), and doubts about effectiveness (59%). Conclusion Respondents reported low self-rated knowledge, uncertainty about treatment evidence and safety, and financial barriers. Findings support clear, balanced patient communication but are limited by self-selection and the sample’s demographic composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopedic Reviews
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.172454
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Attitudes Towards Regenerative Orthopedic Therapy

Omar Viswanath, Latha Ganti, Pranay Gadikota, Dharish Kalaisenthil
Orthopedic Reviews
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Public Attitudes Towards Regenerative Orthopedic Therapy

Omar Viswanath, Latha Ganti, Pranay Gadikota, Dharish Kalaisenthil
article en

Abstract

Objective To assess awareness, self-rated knowledge, treatment perceptions, and perceived barriers concerning regenerative orthopedic therapies. Methods An anonymous, opt-in, cross-sectional online survey of 100 US adults was analyzed using unweighted descriptive statistics. Results Mean age was 63.5 years; 64% were female. Sixty percent reported prior awareness, while 77% rated their knowledge as little or none. Stem cell therapy was recognized by 84% and platelet-rich plasma by 30%. Physicians were the primary medical information source for 71%; 63% would consider physician-recommended treatment. Seventy-seven percent would pay nothing or less than $500 per session. Perceived barriers included cost (72%), lack of insurance coverage (62%), and doubts about effectiveness (59%). Conclusion Respondents reported low self-rated knowledge, uncertainty about treatment evidence and safety, and financial barriers. Findings support clear, balanced patient communication but are limited by self-selection and the sample’s demographic composition.

Orthopedic ReviewsVol. 18
Creighton University (US), Harvard University (US), Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.