Evidence-State Drift: A Claim-Level Framework and Replay Benchmark for Web-Connected LLM Agents

This paper introduces Evidence-State Drift, a claim-level framework for monitoring changes in evidence used by web-connected large language model (LLM) agents over repeated retrieval events. The framework represents evidence using a normalized claim, evidence span, source identity, retrieval and publication timestamps, content fingerprint, and source-authority label. It aims to distinguish material changes in claim-associated evidence from non-material modifications, such as formatting changes, that do not alter the monitored claim. The study evaluates the proposed representation using a longitudinal replay benchmark containing 67 claims and 871 observation events, including 47 oracle-defined material changes. Within this benchmark, the claim-state detector achieved an F1 score of 0.989 against a predefined deterministic change oracle, with no false positives among 824 oracle-defined non-material events. These results indicate consistency with the benchmark’s predefined change rules. They do not establish independent semantic validation or improved factual accuracy in deployed LLM agents. Independent human evaluation and end-to-end agent testing remain areas for future work. This research contributes to the study of evidence monitoring, information freshness, data provenance, and reliability in web-connected AI systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23452133
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-State Drift: A Claim-Level Framework and Replay Benchmark for Web-Connected LLM Agents

Jai Kinger
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Evidence-State Drift: A Claim-Level Framework and Replay Benchmark for Web-Connected LLM Agents

Jai Kinger
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces Evidence-State Drift, a claim-level framework for monitoring changes in evidence used by web-connected large language model (LLM) agents over repeated retrieval events. The framework represents evidence using a normalized claim, evidence span, source identity, retrieval and publication timestamps, content fingerprint, and source-authority label. It aims to distinguish material changes in claim-associated evidence from non-material modifications, such as formatting changes, that do not alter the monitored claim. The study evaluates the proposed representation using a longitudinal replay benchmark containing 67 claims and 871 observation events, including 47 oracle-defined material changes. Within this benchmark, the claim-state detector achieved an F1 score of 0.989 against a predefined deterministic change oracle, with no false positives among 824 oracle-defined non-material events. These results indicate consistency with the benchmark’s predefined change rules. They do not establish independent semantic validation or improved factual accuracy in deployed LLM agents. Independent human evaluation and end-to-end agent testing remain areas for future work. This research contributes to the study of evidence monitoring, information freshness, data provenance, and reliability in web-connected AI systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.