When Messages With Persuasive Motives Are AI ‐Enhanced: An Examination of Receivers' Evaluations of the Sender

ABSTRACT The rapid development of easily accessible AI‐based tools makes it possible for senders to enhance the text in their messages. Yet, how receivers react to such messages, particularly when the use of AI is not disclosed, is far from clear. This study examines the effects of AI‐enhanced text on the receiver's reactions to the individual sender. The results from three experiments, in which messages from senders with persuasive intent were manipulated (no AI enhancement vs. AI enhancement), show that receivers reacted with reduced evaluations of the sender when the text was AI‐enhanced. Moreover, in each experiment, this effect was mediated by beliefs about AI use and trust in the sender. The results imply that senders (who want to be positively evaluated) should avoid enhancing their texts by means that boost receivers' beliefs about the involvement of AI tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70268
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Messages With Persuasive Motives Are AI ‐Enhanced: An Examination of Receivers' Evaluations of the Sender

Maria Mårtensson, Magnus Söderlund
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
AI in Service Interactions
article

When Messages With Persuasive Motives Are AI ‐Enhanced: An Examination of Receivers' Evaluations of the Sender

Maria Mårtensson, Magnus Söderlund
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The rapid development of easily accessible AI‐based tools makes it possible for senders to enhance the text in their messages. Yet, how receivers react to such messages, particularly when the use of AI is not disclosed, is far from clear. This study examines the effects of AI‐enhanced text on the receiver's reactions to the individual sender. The results from three experiments, in which messages from senders with persuasive intent were manipulated (no AI enhancement vs. AI enhancement), show that receivers reacted with reduced evaluations of the sender when the text was AI‐enhanced. Moreover, in each experiment, this effect was mediated by beliefs about AI use and trust in the sender. The results imply that senders (who want to be positively evaluated) should avoid enhancing their texts by means that boost receivers' beliefs about the involvement of AI tools.

Journal of Consumer Behaviour
Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Messages With Persuasive Motives Are AI ‐Enhanced: An Examination of Receivers' Evaluations of the Sender — Maria Mårtensson, Magnus Söderlund · Journal of Consumer Behaviour (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS