Strand orientation, rate heterogeneity and rearrangements: a check of an alignment-free test for recombination in bacterial genomes

A replication and check of the alignment-free test for recombination of Haubold et al. (2013, Bioinformatics 29:3121–3127) on the 58 Escherichia coli genomes of the original study, with a census of strand orientation in 720 complete bacterial genomes from 80 genera. Main findings. (1) The test’s statistic Dr is far from its assumed standard normal distribution even when its model holds, and a mutation rate that varies along the genome, without recombination, makes 95–100% of simulated pairs significant. (2) Nine of the 58 genomes are deposited as the reverse complement of the others. Because the method compares one strand only, all fifteen pairs with the highest variance ratio are pairs in opposite orientation, and the one pair with a known transfer (KO11 vs K-12 MG1655) moves from rank 481 to rank 2 after orientation. In the census, 24% of genomes are deposited in reverse relative to the reference of their species and 23% match neither orientation as a whole. The published NCBI submission rules set no convention for the strand of a complete chromosome. (3) An order-dependent scan with a block-resampling null, tested as a remedy, is calibrated only when rate variation is shorter than the block; on near-identical genomes it reports rearrangements, such as the inversion between rRNA operons in K-12 W3110. Practical consequence: any comparison of genomes that reads one strand only should orient the genomes first and report the orientation used; genomes that match neither orientation need a structural comparison. Files: the preprint (PDF) and four CSV tables with a README describing every column. All genomes are public NCBI records. The study was carried out with the assistance of an AI system (Claude, by Anthropic); see the preface.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23459833
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Strand orientation, rate heterogeneity and rearrangements: a check of an alignment-free test for recombination in bacterial genomes

Luca Lupinacci
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
preprint

Strand orientation, rate heterogeneity and rearrangements: a check of an alignment-free test for recombination in bacterial genomes

Luca Lupinacci
preprint en

Abstract

A replication and check of the alignment-free test for recombination of Haubold et al. (2013, Bioinformatics 29:3121–3127) on the 58 Escherichia coli genomes of the original study, with a census of strand orientation in 720 complete bacterial genomes from 80 genera. Main findings. (1) The test’s statistic Dr is far from its assumed standard normal distribution even when its model holds, and a mutation rate that varies along the genome, without recombination, makes 95–100% of simulated pairs significant. (2) Nine of the 58 genomes are deposited as the reverse complement of the others. Because the method compares one strand only, all fifteen pairs with the highest variance ratio are pairs in opposite orientation, and the one pair with a known transfer (KO11 vs K-12 MG1655) moves from rank 481 to rank 2 after orientation. In the census, 24% of genomes are deposited in reverse relative to the reference of their species and 23% match neither orientation as a whole. The published NCBI submission rules set no convention for the strand of a complete chromosome. (3) An order-dependent scan with a block-resampling null, tested as a remedy, is calibrated only when rate variation is shorter than the block; on near-identical genomes it reports rearrangements, such as the inversion between rRNA operons in K-12 W3110. Practical consequence: any comparison of genomes that reads one strand only should orient the genomes first and report the orientation used; genomes that match neither orientation need a structural comparison. Files: the preprint (PDF) and four CSV tables with a README describing every column. All genomes are public NCBI records. The study was carried out with the assistance of an AI system (Claude, by Anthropic); see the preface.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.