Home‐Based Medical Care in Traditional Medicare vs. Medicare Advantage Among Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

ABSTRACT Background As Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) progress, many people become homebound and depend on home‐based medical care (HBMC), but differences in HBMC, telemedicine, and office visits between Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are not well understood. Methods We analyzed 2021–2022 Medicare claims and encounter data to categorize 2022 outpatient visits for community‐living TM and MA enrollees with ADRD as HBMC, telemedicine, or office‐based. We summarized HBMC recipient characteristics by plan type and used Poisson regression with inverse weights of propensity of plan enrollment and regional fixed effects to compare TM and MA enrollees on visit counts, usage incidence, and visit intensity by visit modality. We also examined differences by comorbidity burden, frailty, dual Medicaid eligibility, race and ethnicity, and major MA plans. Results Out of 49,194 TM and 47,830 MA enrollees with ADRD, MA enrollees had fewer overall visits (TM = 8.89; MA = 7.97) and HBMC visits (TM = 2.09; MA = 1.37) compared to TM enrollees. Adjusted analyses showed that the number of HBMC visits was 25% lower (IRR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81) in MA compared to TM, arising from 19% and 7% lower user incidence and visit intensity, respectively. Office visits were 6% lower (IRR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91–0.96), telemedicine visits were similar (IRR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95–1.10), and overall visits were 10% lower (IRR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88–0.93) in MA relative to TM. Relative to TM, HBMC visits were lower in MA by a larger margin among non‐Hispanic Black (47%), Hispanic (67%), and dual Medicaid‐eligible (42%) MA enrollees. Within MA, HBMC visits were 27% higher (IRR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09–1.48) in PPO plans relative to HMO plans. Conclusions HBMC user incidence and visit intensity were higher in TM than MA among enrollees with ADRD. The findings underscore the need for research and targeted interventions to ensure adequate and equitable access to HBMC services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70781
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Home‐Based Medical Care in Traditional Medicare vs. Medicare Advantage Among Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Emilie Danielle Duchesneau, Stephanie K. Nothelle, Zhang Zhang, Amresh D Hanchate et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Home‐Based Medical Care in Traditional Medicare vs. Medicare Advantage Among Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Emilie Danielle Duchesneau, Stephanie K. Nothelle, Zhang Zhang, Amresh D Hanchate, Bruce P. Kinosian, Mia Yang, Michael P. Bancks, Lindsey Abdelfattah
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background As Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) progress, many people become homebound and depend on home‐based medical care (HBMC), but differences in HBMC, telemedicine, and office visits between Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are not well understood. Methods We analyzed 2021–2022 Medicare claims and encounter data to categorize 2022 outpatient visits for community‐living TM and MA enrollees with ADRD as HBMC, telemedicine, or office‐based. We summarized HBMC recipient characteristics by plan type and used Poisson regression with inverse weights of propensity of plan enrollment and regional fixed effects to compare TM and MA enrollees on visit counts, usage incidence, and visit intensity by visit modality. We also examined differences by comorbidity burden, frailty, dual Medicaid eligibility, race and ethnicity, and major MA plans. Results Out of 49,194 TM and 47,830 MA enrollees with ADRD, MA enrollees had fewer overall visits (TM = 8.89; MA = 7.97) and HBMC visits (TM = 2.09; MA = 1.37) compared to TM enrollees. Adjusted analyses showed that the number of HBMC visits was 25% lower (IRR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81) in MA compared to TM, arising from 19% and 7% lower user incidence and visit intensity, respectively. Office visits were 6% lower (IRR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91–0.96), telemedicine visits were similar (IRR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95–1.10), and overall visits were 10% lower (IRR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88–0.93) in MA relative to TM. Relative to TM, HBMC visits were lower in MA by a larger margin among non‐Hispanic Black (47%), Hispanic (67%), and dual Medicaid‐eligible (42%) MA enrollees. Within MA, HBMC visits were 27% higher (IRR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09–1.48) in PPO plans relative to HMO plans. Conclusions HBMC user incidence and visit intensity were higher in TM than MA among enrollees with ADRD. The findings underscore the need for research and targeted interventions to ensure adequate and equitable access to HBMC services.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Atrium Medical Cente (US), Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US), Wake Forest University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.