Evaluating predictors of clinical reasoning competency: A cross-sectional study of the role of systems thinking in Iranian clinical nurses

The complexity of healthcare delivery necessitates a comprehensive understanding of clinical practice and the systems within which it operates. The clinical reasoning competency is essential for nurses as they navigate the complexities of patient care, encompassing cognitive processes that enable informed decision-making and effective interventions. This study investigated the determinants of clinical reasoning competency among nurses in Ardabil, Iran, addressing the limited empirical evidence in Iranian nursing practice. In this cross-sectional study conducted in Ardabil, Iran, 400 clinical nurses were recruited through simple random sampling from five teaching and treatment hospitals. Eligible participants were registered nurses with at least a bachelor’s degree and more than six months of clinical experience. Data were collected using a demographic form, the clinical reasoning competency scale, and the systems thinking scale. The study found significant relationships between demographic variables—age, work experience, and education—and clinical reasoning competency. Age (B=0.556, P=0.022), work experience (B=1.484, P=0.020), and education level (B=3.958, P<0.001) together accounted for 62.6% of the variance in clinical reasoning competency among nurses. Additionally, systems thinking (B=3.958, P<0.001) accounted for an additional 27.0% of the variance, reinforcing its role in enhancing clinical reasoning. The results underscore the critical role of education, clinical experience, and systems thinking in enhancing nurses’ clinical reasoning competency. Future research should examine the incorporation of standardized nursing languages (e.g., North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International, Nursing Interventions Classification/Nursing Outcomes Classification) into clinical reasoning frameworks and evaluate their effects on patient outcomes. Moreover, longitudinal and interventional studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the development of targeted training programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22034/jnacs.2026.1253
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating predictors of clinical reasoning competency: A cross-sectional study of the role of systems thinking in Iranian clinical nurses

Mina Nahamin, Behrouz Dadkhah, Mohammad Ali Mohammadi, Samaneh Vahedi
4 links
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Evaluating predictors of clinical reasoning competency: A cross-sectional study of the role of systems thinking in Iranian clinical nurses

Mina Nahamin, Behrouz Dadkhah, Mohammad Ali Mohammadi, Samaneh Vahedi
article en

Abstract

The complexity of healthcare delivery necessitates a comprehensive understanding of clinical practice and the systems within which it operates. The clinical reasoning competency is essential for nurses as they navigate the complexities of patient care, encompassing cognitive processes that enable informed decision-making and effective interventions. This study investigated the determinants of clinical reasoning competency among nurses in Ardabil, Iran, addressing the limited empirical evidence in Iranian nursing practice. In this cross-sectional study conducted in Ardabil, Iran, 400 clinical nurses were recruited through simple random sampling from five teaching and treatment hospitals. Eligible participants were registered nurses with at least a bachelor’s degree and more than six months of clinical experience. Data were collected using a demographic form, the clinical reasoning competency scale, and the systems thinking scale. The study found significant relationships between demographic variables—age, work experience, and education—and clinical reasoning competency. Age (B=0.556, P=0.022), work experience (B=1.484, P=0.020), and education level (B=3.958, P<0.001) together accounted for 62.6% of the variance in clinical reasoning competency among nurses. Additionally, systems thinking (B=3.958, P<0.001) accounted for an additional 27.0% of the variance, reinforcing its role in enhancing clinical reasoning. The results underscore the critical role of education, clinical experience, and systems thinking in enhancing nurses’ clinical reasoning competency. Future research should examine the incorporation of standardized nursing languages (e.g., North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International, Nursing Interventions Classification/Nursing Outcomes Classification) into clinical reasoning frameworks and evaluate their effects on patient outcomes. Moreover, longitudinal and interventional studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the development of targeted training programs.

DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon