Concussion Safety Beliefs and Participation Decisions Among US Adults With a History of Concussion
Introduction Concussion safety education must address specific participation decisions as well as general beliefs. Method An anonymous, opt-in online survey of 100 US adults with self-reported concussion history was analyzed descriptively. Results Ninety-one percent endorsed avoiding same-day return after suspected concussion, and 81% would not allow a child to continue immediately after a “mild” concussion. Among the 91 endorsing no same-day return, 9 would allow immediate continuation, 7 selected sport-dependent participation, and 2 were unsure. Medical clearance was supported by 88% on an agreement item, whereas 77% selected clearance after every concussion on a separate question. Conclusions Responses varied across differently worded safety questions; they do not establish actual behavior or national prevalence. Practical Applications Education could distinguish immediate removal from later graduated return and explicitly address injuries described as mild. These descriptive findings support testing such messages, rather than demonstrating their effectiveness.
Authors
- Omar Viswanath (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7037)
- Samuel Andrade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4404-0405)
- Latha Ganti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-3864)
- Sonali Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2389-7829)
Institutions
- Creighton University (US)
- Brown University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Orthopedic Reviews
- Published
- 2026-10-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.172466
- Primary Topic
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00