Concussion Safety Beliefs and Participation Decisions Among US Adults With a History of Concussion

Introduction Concussion safety education must address specific participation decisions as well as general beliefs. Method An anonymous, opt-in online survey of 100 US adults with self-reported concussion history was analyzed descriptively. Results Ninety-one percent endorsed avoiding same-day return after suspected concussion, and 81% would not allow a child to continue immediately after a “mild” concussion. Among the 91 endorsing no same-day return, 9 would allow immediate continuation, 7 selected sport-dependent participation, and 2 were unsure. Medical clearance was supported by 88% on an agreement item, whereas 77% selected clearance after every concussion on a separate question. Conclusions Responses varied across differently worded safety questions; they do not establish actual behavior or national prevalence. Practical Applications Education could distinguish immediate removal from later graduated return and explicitly address injuries described as mild. These descriptive findings support testing such messages, rather than demonstrating their effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopedic Reviews
Published
2026-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.172466
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concussion Safety Beliefs and Participation Decisions Among US Adults With a History of Concussion

Omar Viswanath, Samuel Andrade, Latha Ganti, Sonali Anderson
Orthopedic Reviews
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Concussion Safety Beliefs and Participation Decisions Among US Adults With a History of Concussion

Omar Viswanath, Samuel Andrade, Latha Ganti, Sonali Anderson
article en

Abstract

Introduction Concussion safety education must address specific participation decisions as well as general beliefs. Method An anonymous, opt-in online survey of 100 US adults with self-reported concussion history was analyzed descriptively. Results Ninety-one percent endorsed avoiding same-day return after suspected concussion, and 81% would not allow a child to continue immediately after a “mild” concussion. Among the 91 endorsing no same-day return, 9 would allow immediate continuation, 7 selected sport-dependent participation, and 2 were unsure. Medical clearance was supported by 88% on an agreement item, whereas 77% selected clearance after every concussion on a separate question. Conclusions Responses varied across differently worded safety questions; they do not establish actual behavior or national prevalence. Practical Applications Education could distinguish immediate removal from later graduated return and explicitly address injuries described as mild. These descriptive findings support testing such messages, rather than demonstrating their effectiveness.

Orthopedic ReviewsVol. 18
Creighton University (US), Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Concussion Safety Beliefs and Participation Decisions Among US Adults With a History of Concussion — Omar Viswanath, Samuel Andrade, et al. · Orthopedic Reviews (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS