Homogeneous radion evolution in a stabilised two-brane bulk: comparison with a reduced four-dimensional model

We compare homogeneous radion evolution in a Goldberger–Wise-stabilised five-dimensional bulk with a reduced four-dimensional Einstein-frame model. Over one bulk linear period, initial excursions spanning 1.6 × 10⁻³ to 1.3 × 10⁻² give separation differences of 0.588–0.589% and velocity differences of 0.768–0.805%, normalised by initial excursion and reference velocity. The models are differently tuned and their comparison assumes a bulk slice-length map. Their 0.12% equilibrium-mass difference predicts most of the first-turning delay. Subtracting that prediction leaves a negative residual resolved at three of four amplitudes. A four-point fit, registered after two of the amplitudes had been run (§4.4), spans a factor of eight in excursion, while the individually resolved measurements span four, and gives b₁ = (−0.130 ± 0.012)/k; the variation is numerical sensitivity, not statistical uncertainty. Neither a nonzero intercept nor quadratic curvature is resolved. Refinement gives a local apparent turning-time order of about 4.9. Matching the reduced potential's equilibrium mass preserves the resolved residual within numerical variation. Behaviour beyond one period remains undetermined: both preregistered three-period attempts stopped when the static-null control exceeded its constraint-growth limit, before dynamical comparisons began.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23444819
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Homogeneous radion evolution in a stabilised two-brane bulk: comparison with a reduced four-dimensional model

Jack Cramer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
preprint

Homogeneous radion evolution in a stabilised two-brane bulk: comparison with a reduced four-dimensional model

Jack Cramer
preprint en

Abstract

We compare homogeneous radion evolution in a Goldberger–Wise-stabilised five-dimensional bulk with a reduced four-dimensional Einstein-frame model. Over one bulk linear period, initial excursions spanning 1.6 × 10⁻³ to 1.3 × 10⁻² give separation differences of 0.588–0.589% and velocity differences of 0.768–0.805%, normalised by initial excursion and reference velocity. The models are differently tuned and their comparison assumes a bulk slice-length map. Their 0.12% equilibrium-mass difference predicts most of the first-turning delay. Subtracting that prediction leaves a negative residual resolved at three of four amplitudes. A four-point fit, registered after two of the amplitudes had been run (§4.4), spans a factor of eight in excursion, while the individually resolved measurements span four, and gives b₁ = (−0.130 ± 0.012)/k; the variation is numerical sensitivity, not statistical uncertainty. Neither a nonzero intercept nor quadratic curvature is resolved. Refinement gives a local apparent turning-time order of about 4.9. Matching the reduced potential's equilibrium mass preserves the resolved residual within numerical variation. Behaviour beyond one period remains undetermined: both preregistered three-period attempts stopped when the static-null control exceeded its constraint-growth limit, before dynamical comparisons began.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.