Unhappily Single? Towards a More Accurately Estimated Association Between Romantic Relationship Status and Life Satisfaction

Partnered individuals tend to report higher life satisfaction (LS) than singles (weighted Cohen’s d = .43). However, many studies have suffered from either small sample sizes, unaddressed moderators or confounding variables, and/or single-method biases. To simultaneously address these issues, we used the Estonian Biobank ( N = 77,378) to more accurately estimate the association ( d ) between romantic relationship status and LS. We examined potential moderators (age, gender, income, parental status) and confounders (personality domains and nuances, genetic/familial influences, single-method biases). Individuals in relationships had higher average LS (β = .34), but in a sibling discordant analysis controlling for shared familial backgrounds, polygenic scores for LS, and personality traits the effect was smaller (β = .23; only controlling for personality traits resulted in a similar association, suggesting they captured the other potential confounders). However, combining self-report with informant report to reduce measurement error, the within-family, personality traits-controlled association was d = .32. We believe this represents a more rigorous estimate to date, suggesting that previous studies may have both over- and underestimated the link due to confounders and measurement issues that can only be addressed with multiple methods. Finally, the single-partnered difference was larger among men and those without children, and only those highly or very highly satisfied with their relationship had higher LS than single individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Personality
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070261495236
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unhappily Single? Towards a More Accurately Estimated Association Between Romantic Relationship Status and Life Satisfaction

Rebekka Weidmann, René Mõttus, Uku Vainik, Xiaohui Deng et al.
European Journal of Personality
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Unhappily Single? Towards a More Accurately Estimated Association Between Romantic Relationship Status and Life Satisfaction

Rebekka Weidmann, René Mõttus, Uku Vainik, Xiaohui Deng, Sarah C. E. Stanton, Birgit Malken
article en

Abstract

Partnered individuals tend to report higher life satisfaction (LS) than singles (weighted Cohen’s d = .43). However, many studies have suffered from either small sample sizes, unaddressed moderators or confounding variables, and/or single-method biases. To simultaneously address these issues, we used the Estonian Biobank ( N = 77,378) to more accurately estimate the association ( d ) between romantic relationship status and LS. We examined potential moderators (age, gender, income, parental status) and confounders (personality domains and nuances, genetic/familial influences, single-method biases). Individuals in relationships had higher average LS (β = .34), but in a sibling discordant analysis controlling for shared familial backgrounds, polygenic scores for LS, and personality traits the effect was smaller (β = .23; only controlling for personality traits resulted in a similar association, suggesting they captured the other potential confounders). However, combining self-report with informant report to reduce measurement error, the within-family, personality traits-controlled association was d = .32. We believe this represents a more rigorous estimate to date, suggesting that previous studies may have both over- and underestimated the link due to confounders and measurement issues that can only be addressed with multiple methods. Finally, the single-partnered difference was larger among men and those without children, and only those highly or very highly satisfied with their relationship had higher LS than single individuals.

European Journal of Personality
Brigham Young University (US), McGill University (CA), University of Tartu (EE), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.