GEOSPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN URBAN MAPPING

The article discusses the geospatial features of modern urban mapping, which became possible thanks to geoinformation and geotechnological resources. The everyday practices of citizens are considered, allowing them to record their place in the city. The development of information technology tools makes it possible to discuss online the features of a particular geographical place in the here-and-now format or interact indirectly with those who are not here now, but once were. These are new forms of understanding and symbolic description of the place and time of geographical objects. The transition of fixing geospatial mapping from scientific, objective data to everyday, subjective practices of perception, evaluation and analysis of a geographical place is indicated. Based on the results of a study (n=1200) conducted among residents of cities in the Siberian Federal District, new meanings and conditions for geospatial mapping of urban places are recorded. The assessments of representatives of different generations on the geospatial places of the city are analyzed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Moscow Economic Journal
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046x_2026_11_10_137
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GEOSPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN URBAN MAPPING

Roman Ardashev
Moscow Economic Journal
Geographic Information Systems Studies
article

GEOSPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN URBAN MAPPING

Roman Ardashev
article en

Abstract

The article discusses the geospatial features of modern urban mapping, which became possible thanks to geoinformation and geotechnological resources. The everyday practices of citizens are considered, allowing them to record their place in the city. The development of information technology tools makes it possible to discuss online the features of a particular geographical place in the here-and-now format or interact indirectly with those who are not here now, but once were. These are new forms of understanding and symbolic description of the place and time of geographical objects. The transition of fixing geospatial mapping from scientific, objective data to everyday, subjective practices of perception, evaluation and analysis of a geographical place is indicated. Based on the results of a study (n=1200) conducted among residents of cities in the Siberian Federal District, new meanings and conditions for geospatial mapping of urban places are recorded. The assessments of representatives of different generations on the geospatial places of the city are analyzed.

Moscow Economic Journal
East-Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (RU), Irkutsk State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GEOSPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN URBAN MAPPING — Roman Ardashev · Moscow Economic Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS